Supreme Court Sides With Biden Administration Over Accusations of Social Media Censorship Pressure
June 26, 2024
Major implications for free speech.
Major implications for free speech.
The lawsuit claims the law violates the First Amendment by mandating age verification, risking privacy and online security.
Accusations include the use of private emails and potential unlawful deletion of critical communications.
Claiming the policy stifles open discourse and intimidates students from expressing unpopular opinions.
Samantha Vinograd calls for stricter social media censorship, raising concerns over potential First Amendment infringements.
Facing a potential national ban, TikTok creators sue the US government, arguing that the new law stifles their First Amendment rights and jeopardizes their economic survival.
Stella Assange claims US diplomatic assurances offer no real protection for Julian under the First Amendment.
A judge has granted Media Matters a reprieve by pausing AG Paxton’s investigation.
The case involves three plaintiffs who allege their First Amendment rights were violated when the US Surgeon General and HHS directed Twitter to suspend and censor them for criticizing the government’s Covid response.
Assange has been granted an appeal if the US doesn’t make several provisions.
The entity has flagged social media posts for censorship and has been sued for its promotion of censorship technology.
The justices appeared receptive to the government’s argument that “persuading” private parties to remove content doesn’t violate the First Amendment.
A two-pronged test to determine a First Amendment violation.
Exploring the irony of Jen Psaki’s role amid allegations of government-directed censorship.
It’s now up to Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to decide if he’s going to sign the privacy-invasive and restrictive bill.
The hearing will take place on Friday.
The First Amendment was designed to protect citizens from ideas like Senator Warner’s.
Film companies argue that “an IP address is not a person” in an attempt to force Reddit to share the IP addresses of users.
The bill, if it goes anywhere, will face First Amendment challenges.
Amid legal challenges to the FBI and other federal agencies colluding with private companies to censor Americans’ speech.
The agency ignored requests to hand over documents.
According to the judge, the state forcing tech platforms to publish documents on how they tackle “hate speech” and “misinformation” is allowed.
Lamenting a loss of censorship power.
Media Matters accuses Paxton of violating the First Amendment.
Major implications for free speech.
The lawsuit claims the law violates the First Amendment by mandating age verification, risking privacy and online security.
Accusations include the use of private emails and potential unlawful deletion of critical communications.
Claiming the policy stifles open discourse and intimidates students from expressing unpopular opinions.
Samantha Vinograd calls for stricter social media censorship, raising concerns over potential First Amendment infringements.
Facing a potential national ban, TikTok creators sue the US government, arguing that the new law stifles their First Amendment rights and jeopardizes their economic survival.
Stella Assange claims US diplomatic assurances offer no real protection for Julian under the First Amendment.
A judge has granted Media Matters a reprieve by pausing AG Paxton’s investigation.
The case involves three plaintiffs who allege their First Amendment rights were violated when the US Surgeon General and HHS directed Twitter to suspend and censor them for criticizing the government’s Covid response.
Assange has been granted an appeal if the US doesn’t make several provisions.
The entity has flagged social media posts for censorship and has been sued for its promotion of censorship technology.
The justices appeared receptive to the government’s argument that “persuading” private parties to remove content doesn’t violate the First Amendment.
A two-pronged test to determine a First Amendment violation.
Exploring the irony of Jen Psaki’s role amid allegations of government-directed censorship.
It’s now up to Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to decide if he’s going to sign the privacy-invasive and restrictive bill.
The hearing will take place on Friday.
The First Amendment was designed to protect citizens from ideas like Senator Warner’s.
Film companies argue that “an IP address is not a person” in an attempt to force Reddit to share the IP addresses of users.
The bill, if it goes anywhere, will face First Amendment challenges.
Amid legal challenges to the FBI and other federal agencies colluding with private companies to censor Americans’ speech.
The agency ignored requests to hand over documents.
According to the judge, the state forcing tech platforms to publish documents on how they tackle “hate speech” and “misinformation” is allowed.
Lamenting a loss of censorship power.
Media Matters accuses Paxton of violating the First Amendment.