Resist censorship and surveillance. Reclaim your digital freedom.

Get news, features, and alternative tech explorations to defend your digital rights.

YouTube Faces Backlash for Quietly Using AI to Alter Shorts Without Creator Consent

The edits feel less like enhancements and more like reminders that AI is now part of the creative process, whether you asked for it or not.

Three-by-two collage of close-up cropped shots showing a person's right ear and the temple of eyeglasses against a neutral brown background.

Some YouTube creators are calling foul after learning the platform has been quietly using AI to modify their Shorts without notification or approval.

For months, users have noticed odd visual quirks in some Shorts, such as skin that looks overly airbrushed, clothes appearing sharper than expected, or facial features slightly distorted.

The alterations are subtle enough to go unnoticed in isolation, but side-by-side comparisons have revealed inconsistencies that many say make their videos feel unnatural or artificial.

Musician and creator Rhett Shull spotlighted the issue in a video that has drawn over 700,000 views. Comparing his uploads across platforms, he pointed out that YouTube had seemingly softened and retouched his Shorts without permission.

โ€œI did not consent to this,โ€ said Shull. โ€œReplacing or enhancing my work with some AI upscaling system not only erodes trust with the audience, but it also erodes my trust in YouTube.โ€

Side-by-side screenshots of an ornate armored Warframe character wearing a tall helmet with vertical lights and red-and-silver organic armor, standing against a blue icy cave backdrop with the caption "I AM A PIOUS WARFRAME" and a triangular play icon visible on the left panel.

That lack of transparency has provoked a wider conversation. In June, a Reddit thread titled โ€œYouTube Shorts are almost certainly being AI upscaledโ€ included frame-by-frame comparisons suggesting AI manipulation. The post drew widespread frustration, adding to the growing chorus of disapproval.

After staying silent for months, YouTube has now acknowledged that it has been conducting tests. Rene Ritchie, who serves as YouTubeโ€™s liaison to creators, addressed the concerns in a post on X.

Dark-mode screenshot of a verified YouTube Liaison tweet stating โ€œNo GenAI, no upscalingโ€ and explaining an experiment on select YouTube Shorts using traditional machine learning to unblur, denoise and improve video clarity, with an embedded DeanoSauruz question and Aug 20, 2025 timestamps and view count.

According to Ritchie, the platform has been experimenting with traditional machine learning technology to unblur, denoise, and improve clarity on select Shorts, similar to automatic adjustments made by smartphone cameras.

Ritchie stressed that this is not generative AI, which produces new material from scratch.

But creators argue that the label is irrelevant if the platform is altering their content without their knowledge.

Content creators are now demanding more control, calling on YouTube to allow opt-out settings for any AI-based processing. They argue that unexpected alterations compromise both creative intent and viewer trust.

The backlash arrives not long after another controversial AI deployment by YouTube, a new system in the US that surveils users and estimates a viewerโ€™s age and can block access to certain videos until the user has verified with some form of ID, if the AI suspects the viewer is underage.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

More you should know:

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Resist censorship and surveillance. Reclaim your digital freedom.

Get news, features, and alternative tech explorations to defend your digital rights.

Share this post