Supreme Court Pressures Meta: Justices Demand Response in CHD Censorship Case
March 7, 2025
The Supreme Court’s request suggests growing judicial interest in the relationship between tech platforms and government influence.
The Supreme Court’s request suggests growing judicial interest in the relationship between tech platforms and government influence.
Trump’s return to the White House could decide whether TikTok stays or disappears for 170 million US users.
Americans are trading one Chinese app for another.
Meta’s sudden shift on “fact-checking” puts pressure on the tech giant to reinstate Children’s Health Defense accounts amid Supreme Court review.
AAF defends national security as TikTok calls foul on First Amendment grounds.
A delay could reshape the digital landscape while redefining government power over online platforms.
TikTok petitions the Supreme Court, arguing a federal ban threatens free speech, business innovation, and an open internet in the US.
TikTok faces a legal showdown as a court denies its bid to pause a law mandating divestment or removal by January 19.
Supreme Court to deliberate on Stockton v. Ferguson, addressing First Amendment rights of doctors criticizing Covid policies and censorship claims.
A Supreme Court showdown over free speech looms as Dr. Gill challenges medical regulators’ power to silence dissenting voices.
Compelled speech.
Court allows further discovery in Missouri v. Biden, possibly unveiling deeper government ties to social media censorship.
The legal group argues that additional investigation will uncover a broader, orchestrated suppression of dissenting voices on critical public issues.
The Supreme Court’s ruling revives a critical case on press freedom, with significant implications for government accountability and the protection of citizen journalists.
X’s return to Brazil signals a significant capitulation as the platform bows to court-ordered censorship and fines.
Consultation with prosecutor general adds new hurdle, further delaying decision on restoring Musk’s X in Brazil.
Retaliation.
A tense standoff between tech and government.
Peterson claims the ruling undermines free speech and could lead to the revocation of his psychology license.
As the US gears up for another election, concerns over FBI’s renewed engagement with social media giants raise fears of political censorship under the guise of combating foreign influence.
Legal showdown over Biden administration’s social media policies heats up with key court decisions pending.
Governor Mills’s office involves law enforcement in response to social media backlash, raising concerns about free speech rights.
Legal challenge argues First Amendment infringement and raises privacy concerns over mandatory personal data disclosure.
But the court made its First Amendment stance very clear.
The Supreme Court’s request suggests growing judicial interest in the relationship between tech platforms and government influence.
Trump’s return to the White House could decide whether TikTok stays or disappears for 170 million US users.
Americans are trading one Chinese app for another.
Meta’s sudden shift on “fact-checking” puts pressure on the tech giant to reinstate Children’s Health Defense accounts amid Supreme Court review.
AAF defends national security as TikTok calls foul on First Amendment grounds.
A delay could reshape the digital landscape while redefining government power over online platforms.
TikTok petitions the Supreme Court, arguing a federal ban threatens free speech, business innovation, and an open internet in the US.
TikTok faces a legal showdown as a court denies its bid to pause a law mandating divestment or removal by January 19.
Supreme Court to deliberate on Stockton v. Ferguson, addressing First Amendment rights of doctors criticizing Covid policies and censorship claims.
A Supreme Court showdown over free speech looms as Dr. Gill challenges medical regulators’ power to silence dissenting voices.
Compelled speech.
Court allows further discovery in Missouri v. Biden, possibly unveiling deeper government ties to social media censorship.
The legal group argues that additional investigation will uncover a broader, orchestrated suppression of dissenting voices on critical public issues.
The Supreme Court’s ruling revives a critical case on press freedom, with significant implications for government accountability and the protection of citizen journalists.
X’s return to Brazil signals a significant capitulation as the platform bows to court-ordered censorship and fines.
Consultation with prosecutor general adds new hurdle, further delaying decision on restoring Musk’s X in Brazil.
Retaliation.
A tense standoff between tech and government.
Peterson claims the ruling undermines free speech and could lead to the revocation of his psychology license.
As the US gears up for another election, concerns over FBI’s renewed engagement with social media giants raise fears of political censorship under the guise of combating foreign influence.
Legal showdown over Biden administration’s social media policies heats up with key court decisions pending.
Governor Mills’s office involves law enforcement in response to social media backlash, raising concerns about free speech rights.
Legal challenge argues First Amendment infringement and raises privacy concerns over mandatory personal data disclosure.
But the court made its First Amendment stance very clear.
