Subscribe for premier reporting on free speech, privacy, Big Tech, media gatekeepers, and individual liberty online.

Steven Crowder responds to the bogus copyright claims from ABC and Disney

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

It’s been an eventful week for the conservative comedian Steven Crowder. On Sunday, his Anti-Oscars Party live stream was taken down by YouTube after four bogus copyright claims were filed against the stream. A few days later, the investigative research group Project Veritas reported that his live Facebook videos were being throttled. Now he’s fighting back and has announced the steps he’ll be taking to combat this social media censorship.

He made the announcement in a legal update video with his lawyer Bill Richmond which covered the false copyright claims, the Facebook throttling, and potential future legal action. Here are the key takeaways from this video.

Four Bogus Copyright Claims Were Filed Against Crowder’s Anti-Oscars Party Live Stream

In total, four false copyright claims were filed against Crowder’s Anti-Oscars Party live stream and the archive. All the claims were received within 24 hours of each other and three have now been dropped.

Although three of the claims have been dropped, they’ve still had an irreparable negative impact on Crowder, causing him to lose over 40,000 viewers on the live stream and thousands of potential viewers on the archive of the stream.

Here’s a summary of the four copyright claims and their current status:

  1. DisneyEnterprisesInc. filed the initial copyright claim on Sunday, February 24, 2019, which led to Crowder’s live stream being taken down. At the time of this initial takedown, the stream had 40,000 live viewers and was well on its way to 50,000 viewers. This copyright claim was dropped on Tuesday, February 25, 2019.
  2. AMPAS (Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences) Oscars filed a second copyright claim on Tuesday, February 25, 2019. Crowder’s team filed a counter notification against this claim which AMPAS Oscars disputed briefly before dropping the claim 48 seconds later.
  3. AMPAS Oscars filed a third copyright claim on Tuesday, February 25, 2019, which was dropped shortly after being filed.
  4. AMPAS Oscars filed a fourth copyright claim on Tuesday, February 25, 2019. Crowder’s team has disputed this claim with a counter notification but AMPAS Oscars has not responded and the claim has not yet been dropped.

Crowder’s Anti-Oscars Party Live Stream Was a Transformative Work

Crowder’s stream contained very little footage of The Oscars and the footage that was used contained commentary along with audio and visual overlays which makes it a transformative work.

Here’s the breakdown of the live stream footage:

  • Two hours and 34 minutes of the stream was totally original Crowder content with no footage or audio of The Oscars
  • 31 minutes of the stream was commentary on The Oscars which contained visual and audio overlays that transform the original work into a new work
  • Four minutes of the stream contained full-screen footage of The Oscars with commentary

According to Crowder’s lawyer, this means the work is fully transformative because Crowder and his team were consistently adding comments, adding visuals, and critiquing the work.

YouTube’s Copyright Claims System Is Broken

The way YouTube’s copyright claims system currently works means that the person filing a copyright claim doesn’t have to prove that it’s genuine. Instead, the burden is on the creators who are receiving the claim to prove that it’s false. Until they prove this, their streams and videos are blocked.

With the fourth copyright claim against Crowder, which has yet to be retracted, AMPAS Oscars has a month to respond to the counter notification from Crowder’s team. Crowder’s video remains blocked until the response is filed which means AMPAS Oscars can delay their response and use this as a way to suppress Crowder’s content for 30 more days.

This broken system is incredibly disruptive to creators who are receiving false claims because it means they have to redo work, spend time disputing the false claims, and spend time letting their audience know how these false claims will affect the content the audience members are expecting to see.

It’s also especially damaging when claims are made against content that covers time-sensitive events such as The Oscars or presidential elections. A false copyright claim can block videos about these events for weeks or even months. By the time the claim has been successfully appealed, most of the public interest in the event is gone, and the video loses almost all of its original audience and impact.

Crowder Is Potentially Taking Legal Action

Crowder says that the recent issues with the false copyright claims, the report from Project Veritas, and a previous incident where Facebook suppressed his page have caused him to consider taking legal action.

He’s currently weighing up his options because filing a suit takes time away from content creation and he wants to be sure that his audience is willing to sacrifice some content short-term to be free from the shackles of corporate censorship long-term.

If Crowder decides to take legal action, history is on his side. With the exception of the current copyright claim from AMPAS Oscars, Crowder has had all the previous copyright claims against his channel removed. The YouTuber creators h3h3Productions also won a landmark fair use lawsuit in 2017 which set an important precedent for fair use on the YouTube platform.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Read more

Join the pushback against online censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance.

Already a member? Login.