US House Committee Summons Australian Censor Julie Inman Grant Over Global Takedown Demands
November 19, 2025
Australia’s online censorship laws are colliding head-on with America’s free speech politics.
Australia’s online censorship laws are colliding head-on with America’s free speech politics.
Branded a public threat over a tweet, she now needs government clearance to tell the world what the government has done to her.
The law’s softer tone hides the same blunt instrument: unchecked surveillance wrapped in child safety rhetoric.
An Italian court’s pushback against Google turns a local censorship dispute into a landmark test.
A single post lost in the noise of X becomes a case study in how modern states turn minor speech into major control.
A Facebook meme meant as local humor has turned into a felony case that says more about power than parody.
A new era of streaming begins where every click demands a face, and privacy becomes the price of admission.
A private message turned into a police raid that never should’ve happened.
Durov’s freedom to move contrasts with the lingering case that keeps Europe’s battle over digital free speech alive.
A fantasy world once bursting with color now drifts in silhouette, caught between artistic vision and Apple’s invisible line.
A High Court showdown looms as Australians question whether privacy and free speech can survive the nation’s new digital gatekeepers.
Her urgency exposes a government more eager to control the internet than to understand the cost of regulating it.
His crackdown on “falsehoods” may reveal less about public morality than about who gets to define the truth in modern Korea.
The investigation into X exposes how Europe’s new speech laws let regulators decide which voices get to exist online.
Presented as a defense of democracy, the plan reads more like the architecture of a managed reality.
The proposal would make Israel’s emergency media law permanent, granting the government power to shut outlets and block online content without court approval.
WhatsApp’s move into public broadcasting now puts Meta face-to-face with Europe’s toughest censorship rulebook.
The removals highlight the growing influence of government regulation over China’s digital and social platforms.
The inquiry marks a pivotal test of how financial institutions handle politically sensitive clients under federal scrutiny.
The lawsuits may target Roblox, but the real battleground is whether digital ID systems become the price of admission to everyday online life.
A campaign to curb election “disinformation” risks giving the government final say over what truth is allowed online.
California’s push to verify every user’s age online inches closer to reality as the state tests the limits of privacy in the name of protection.
Barton’s conviction turns the internet’s rough banter into a matter for criminal law.
The bill treats privacy like a loophole, not a right, reshaping the internet into a government ID checkpoint.
Australia’s online censorship laws are colliding head-on with America’s free speech politics.
Branded a public threat over a tweet, she now needs government clearance to tell the world what the government has done to her.
The law’s softer tone hides the same blunt instrument: unchecked surveillance wrapped in child safety rhetoric.
An Italian court’s pushback against Google turns a local censorship dispute into a landmark test.
A single post lost in the noise of X becomes a case study in how modern states turn minor speech into major control.
A Facebook meme meant as local humor has turned into a felony case that says more about power than parody.
A new era of streaming begins where every click demands a face, and privacy becomes the price of admission.
A private message turned into a police raid that never should’ve happened.
Durov’s freedom to move contrasts with the lingering case that keeps Europe’s battle over digital free speech alive.
A fantasy world once bursting with color now drifts in silhouette, caught between artistic vision and Apple’s invisible line.
A High Court showdown looms as Australians question whether privacy and free speech can survive the nation’s new digital gatekeepers.
Her urgency exposes a government more eager to control the internet than to understand the cost of regulating it.
His crackdown on “falsehoods” may reveal less about public morality than about who gets to define the truth in modern Korea.
The investigation into X exposes how Europe’s new speech laws let regulators decide which voices get to exist online.
Presented as a defense of democracy, the plan reads more like the architecture of a managed reality.
The proposal would make Israel’s emergency media law permanent, granting the government power to shut outlets and block online content without court approval.
WhatsApp’s move into public broadcasting now puts Meta face-to-face with Europe’s toughest censorship rulebook.
The removals highlight the growing influence of government regulation over China’s digital and social platforms.
The inquiry marks a pivotal test of how financial institutions handle politically sensitive clients under federal scrutiny.
The lawsuits may target Roblox, but the real battleground is whether digital ID systems become the price of admission to everyday online life.
A campaign to curb election “disinformation” risks giving the government final say over what truth is allowed online.
California’s push to verify every user’s age online inches closer to reality as the state tests the limits of privacy in the name of protection.
Barton’s conviction turns the internet’s rough banter into a matter for criminal law.
The bill treats privacy like a loophole, not a right, reshaping the internet into a government ID checkpoint.