The decision raises concerns that “negligent design” theories could be used to circumvent Section 230 immunity.
The brief mentions suggested any potential changes to Section 230.
The case could potentially redefine the scope of online platforms’ immunity when making algorithmic recommendations.
The ruling falls in line with similar cases.
New threats to regulate social media.
Two new cases could change the scope of Section 230’s liability protections.
Thomas believes the scope of the law should be limited.
Similar bills have been ill-fated and this one will almost certainly fail too.
The draft bill is written in a way that would cause more online censorship.
An unforeseen challenge to free speech.
Section 230 is increasingly politicized.
The bill targets Section 230.
The 2nd Circuit Appeals Court agreed to take a look.
The court said Congress has much to address.
This isn’t expected to get anywhere but it’s worth hearing about.
The complaint alleges Twitter’s censorship was encouraged by the Massachusetts Secretary of State.
Ulterior motive.
Even after Twitter says it reviewed the content.
The judge has ruled.
Matt Hancock is the former culture secretary.
Even when the selective censorship is on full display, users have little recourse.
YouTubers want an emergency injunction against the deletion of their accounts.
One of many bills are looking to see what can be done about increasing free expression online.
Reddit has filed a response to the FCC.
The decision raises concerns that “negligent design” theories could be used to circumvent Section 230 immunity.
The brief mentions suggested any potential changes to Section 230.
The case could potentially redefine the scope of online platforms’ immunity when making algorithmic recommendations.
The ruling falls in line with similar cases.
New threats to regulate social media.
Two new cases could change the scope of Section 230’s liability protections.
Thomas believes the scope of the law should be limited.
Similar bills have been ill-fated and this one will almost certainly fail too.
The draft bill is written in a way that would cause more online censorship.
An unforeseen challenge to free speech.
Section 230 is increasingly politicized.
The bill targets Section 230.
The 2nd Circuit Appeals Court agreed to take a look.
The court said Congress has much to address.
This isn’t expected to get anywhere but it’s worth hearing about.
The complaint alleges Twitter’s censorship was encouraged by the Massachusetts Secretary of State.
Ulterior motive.
Even after Twitter says it reviewed the content.
The judge has ruled.
Matt Hancock is the former culture secretary.
Even when the selective censorship is on full display, users have little recourse.
YouTubers want an emergency injunction against the deletion of their accounts.
One of many bills are looking to see what can be done about increasing free expression online.
Reddit has filed a response to the FCC.
