UK Labour Voters Surprised to Learn Twitter Doesn’t Reflect Reality

Digital echo chambers have been realized.

Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn on a debate stage with a Twitter logo superimposed in the center.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

UK’s election has come and gone – emerging the Conservative Party and its leader Boris Johnson as securing a very convincing victory.

During the final stages of the campaign, even though all arrows were pointing toward a Conservatives triumph – nobody was quite ready to predict the magnitude of the historic landslide. But that’s what happened: the best result for the Conservatives since Margaret Thatcher’s reign in the 1980s, and the worst showing for the Labour Party since some time before the Second World War.

A tweet by Liz quoting Gavin Free, warning people not to rely on Twitter echo chambers to win elections.
Tweet by Gavin Free stating that one thing he is reminded of during elections is that most people are not on Twitter.
Tweet by user BluePaul discussing how Twitter served as an echo chamber predicting a Labour election victory.

And while before the election, there had been variously convincing attempts to say that voter turnout – and digital and other media’s perceived action or inaction might have ended up tipping the scales one way or another – an election landslide is an election landslide, and those types of arguments are lost under it.

Tweet stating looking at Twitter makes you hopeful but reality is the vast majority don't use it and vote conservative.
Tweet by Luke Curtis Knox stating the election results prove the popular opinion of Twitter is not in the majority.

All that’s left to do now is try to understand what role a platform like Twitter might have actually had.

The Quartz report essentially sums up a long narrative to tell us what many people have been saying all along: Twitter is an influential echo-chamber for journalists, politicians, activists, and the like; but when it comes to the actual population of a country – don’t look to Twitter for any viable election, or otherwise predictions.

Post by Andrew Sullivan stating that if Democrats do not stop their hard-left slide, they will suffer the same fate as Labour.
A tweet by user Mad Hatter commenting on Twitter convincing people of a socialist Labour win.

As the report puts it, while anybody paying attention to real-world cues had been pretty much sure the Conservatives were about to win UK’s election – Twitter was the one place where a Conservative majority “seemed all-but-impossible.

“But here’s the thing: Twitter is not representative of the UK population, or even of the likely voter population,” Quartz – whose vision after “the battle” is a pristine 20/20 – said in their report.

Tweet stating twitter isn't a reflection of reality after not speaking to a single person who didn't vote conservative.
Tweet by user Jacob stating Twitter is not reality, quoting an ABC News report on Donald Trump and Boris Johnson.

But is this a UK-only phenomenon? Or is Twitter by-and-large a platform that nobody should be taking as an indicative barometer of anything past what its “ideological influencer” caste of journalists and politicians might be peddling on any given day?

The report doesn’t go that deep. But it makes it clear: anyone fooled by the fake reality conjured up briefly on social media on December 12 by UK’s Labour Party election optimism – should have known better.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Explore more on these topics