Privacy Ends Where the Cell Tower Begins

The judge ruled tower dumps unconstitutional, then greenlit the evidence they dragged in anyway.

Silhouettes of communication towers against a vibrant sunset sky with purple, pink, and yellow hues above a city skyline with scattered lights.

A federal judge in Nevada just confirmed the obvious. When cops scoop up the private data of thousands of people through a practice known as a “tower dump,” that’s a search. A big one. An unconstitutional one. Then, with a straight face, the same judge allowed police to keep the evidence they got from it because they (supposedly) meant well.

This is how American justice handles mass surveillance now. Step one, violate the Fourth Amendment. Step two, say you didn’t know you were doing it. Step three, win.

Red shield logo with three stylized black and white arrows curving outward, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in grey and 'THE NET' in red

Become a Member and Keep Reading…

Reclaim your digital freedom. Get the latest on censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance, and learn how to fight back.

Already a supporter? Sign In.
(If you’re already logged in but still seeing this, refresh this page to show the post.)
Having trouble logging in? Get help here.

More you should know:

Share this post