If code is speech, the First Amendment could prevent tech companies being forced to add backdoors and moderation tools

? It's already holding up.

The outcome of a legal battle in the US state of Arizona, over the First Amendment and a state law on data protection and sharing by car dealers, could eventually have much broader implications, including on such issues like initiatives to introduce encryption-breaking backdoors.

At the very least, its outcome could provide another building block in the effort to bring more legal clarity to the status of computer code in terms of First Amendment’s free speech protections, particularly the doctrine prohibiting compelled speech.

Red shield logo with three stylized black and white arrows curving outward, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in grey and 'THE NET' in red

Become a Member and Keep Reading…

Reclaim your digital freedom. Get the latest on censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance, and learn how to fight back.

Already a supporter? Sign In.
(If you’re already logged in but still seeing this, refresh this page to show the post.)
Having trouble logging in? Get help here.

More you should know:

Share this post