Clicky

Subscribe for premier reporting on free speech, privacy, Big Tech, media gatekeepers, and individual liberty online.

Is the .io domain name going away? Not likely

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

So you might have an .io domain attached to your – professional – or personal – website? Otherwise – if you just happen to be in that general state of tech mind – you might be coming across such domains out there all the time.

Either case, it is not at all unlikely – as over the years the .io domain has become popular with the loosely termed “tech crowd.” It might be a “startup” – or indeed, it might be anyone using GitHub’s free hosting service to publish their website, for free, and for fun.

And the reason is simple – .io is a top-level country domain that is still largely up for grabs, and one that also duplicates one of those fundamental tech “memes” – in this case, I/O – input/output – and thus resonates strongly with the said tech crowd.

Imagine how popular – in some circles – a top-level domain that somehow managed to invoke the war of “tabs and spaces” might have been.

Anyway – while existing top-level domains – .com, .org. .net – have long since ran out of short and sweet URLs – and let’s face it, .biz will always remain equally as useful as it is funny and embarrassing – .io has been that cheap yet actually cool and usable alternative.

But wait – what “country” does “.io” actually represent?

Good question. And it turns out – no real country. Not really.

In other words – the .io domain does not represent an actual sovereign state. It stands for “the Chagos Islands.”

Admittedly, things on earth can get darker than colonialism. Like WW2. But then again – not much darker.

And today, the .io domain boils down to the United Nations – that international body set up in the wake of the devastating WW2 to prevent any such catastrophe repeating itself – being in this case, as usual, late to the party.

“This week, the UN’s General Assembly voted overwhelmingly 116-6 to condemn the UK’s occupation of the Chagos Islands,” the Register writes.

The resolution is non-binding, and it supports a decision by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) – in other words, nothing anyone really cares about.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Read more

Join the pushback against online censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance.

Already a member? Login.

Share