Resist censorship and surveillance. Reclaim your digital freedom.

Get news, features, and alternative tech explorations to defend your digital rights.

Judge refuses to dismiss Trump lawsuit against YouTube

The lawsuit is stayed to see how the other lawsuit against Twitter progresses.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

A district judge stayed former President Donald Trumpโ€™s lawsuit against YouTube until the end of the appeal against the dismissal of his case against Twitter. The judge also denied YouTubeโ€™s motion to dismiss the case and Trumpโ€™s motion for preliminary injunction.

We obtained a copy of the order for you here.

Trump sued YouTube, Twitter, and the other tech companies that suspended his accounts following the January 6, 2021 riot at the US Capitol.

In the lawsuit against YouTube, he argued that the permanent ban had a negative impact on his donor platforms and stifled public debate, as well as his efforts to endorse candidates.

The lawsuit, initially filed in the Southern District of Florida, also argues that the censorship violates Floridaโ€™s Stop Social Media Censorship Act, which was blocked by a federal court, and his First Amendment rights. The suit also asks the court to overturn the protections afforded tech platforms under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Trump also claims that YouTube deceived users and โ€œunevenlyโ€ applies its standards, which is a violation of Floridaโ€™s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. He further claims that YouTube โ€œworked with the governmentโ€ to violate his free speech rights.

During Trump’s motion for a preliminary injunction, YouTube said that Trump cannot claim his free speech was violated because rules about what content is allowed and not allowed are laid out in the platformโ€™s community guidelines. Additionally, the platform said reinstating Trumpโ€™s account would cause it โ€œirreparable injuryโ€ and it would violate the companyโ€™s First Amendment rights, which give it the freedom to determine what speech to allow.

โ€œFormer President Trump and seven other plaintiffs are attempting to turn their disagreement with YouTubeโ€™s editorial choices into a federal lawsuit on behalf of a putative nationwide class,โ€ YouTube said. โ€œThis effort fails as a matter of law. By seeking to treat the judgments of a private online service provider as state action, plaintiffs flip the First Amendment on its head.โ€

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

Resist censorship and surveillance. Reclaim your digital freedom.

Get news, features, and alternative tech explorations to defend your digital rights.

More you should know:

Share this post