US Government Helped Launch Project Where Truthful Content About Vaccine Side Effects Was Flagged for Censorship

More evidence of the close censorship ties between Big Tech and government.

A white Twitter bird logo overlaid on a black-and-white background of a person working at computer monitors in a server room.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

The United States (US) federal government helped to launch a project where six Big Tech companies and a coalition of research agencies partnered to mass monitor Covid-related content and flag millions of posts for censorship each day, according to new internal Twitter documents.

The documents were published by journalist Matt Taibbi as part of a new batch of “Twitter Files” — internal documents that have exposed many examples of Big Tech-federal government censorship collusion.

According to Taibbi, “The Virality Project,” a consortium of research partners that push for online censorship, worked with the government to launch a project that surveilled online Covid content and through which millions of items were flagged for review.

Post by Matt Taibbi about the Virality Project working with the government to monitor Covid-related online content.

The documents show the Virality Project (VP), confirming that six Big Tech platforms, Facebook (including Instagram), Twitter, Google (including YouTube), TikTok, Medium, and Pinterest, were “acting on” content that was flagged to them by the Virality Project.

Highlighted document text stating six social media platforms engaged with VP tickets to act on flagged content.

According to Taibbi, the Virality Project flagged a wide range of truthful content to Twitter and branded it as “potential violations or “disinformation ‘events.'”

Some of the many types of truthful content that were flagged include:

  • The “‘vaccine passport’ narrative” (which the Virality Project claimed had “driven a larger anti-vaccination narrative about the loss of rights and freedoms”)
  • “True stories of people experiencing blood clots after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine”
  • “The narrative around ‘natural immunity”
  • Discussions of “breakthrough” infections (which the Virality Project claimed were “extremely rare events” that should not be inferred to mean “vaccines are ineffective”)
  • Suggesting Covid-19 “leaked from a lab”
  • Content that “increased distrust” in then-director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony Fauci
  • Stories about the “surveillance state”
  • “Worrisome jokes”
Email text addressed to the Twitter team highlighting a Virality Project briefing discussing vaccine passport narratives.
Report excerpt titled Safety concerns about AstraZeneca vaccine with highlighted notes on blood clot discussions.
Email to the Twitter Team sharing a Virality Project briefing on COVID-19 vaccine narratives and side effects.
Virality Project email to Twitter team highlighting tracking of natural immunity narratives.
Excerpts from a Virality Project Weekly Briefing discussing a Cleveland Clinic study on natural immunity and vaccines.
Document detailing Virality Project notes on Representative Thomas Massie, natural immunity, and COVID-19 vaccine guidance.
Highlighted text discussing CDC breakthrough cases and social media commentary on coronavirus vaccines.
Virality Project Weekly Briefing report page mentioning Alex Berenson and Anthony Fauci with project partner logos.
Virality Project Weekly Briefing document showing key takeaways on COVID-19 vaccines and Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Document text highlighting discussions of Fauci's emails on Telegram and their impact on anti-vaccine networks.
Virality Project Platform Escalation Summary document listing flagged social media posts about vaccines.
Excerpts of document text discussing Jen Psaki's 2021 door-to-door vaccine outreach announcement, highlighting the word worrisome.

Taibbi noted that Twitter employees soon started to echo some of the Virality Project’s language. In a March 16, 2021 email, which was sent less than a month after Twitter joined the Virality Project, a Twitter employee described tracking “campaigns against vaccine passports,” “fear of mandatory immunizations,” and “misuse of official reporting tools.”

Email listing vaccine-related content themes to track, with text highlighted regarding reporting tools and passports.

Not only did the Virality Project flag truthful content but, according to Taibbi, it would flag posts based on audience reaction and whether the responses to the post were deemed to be “disinformation.”

Tweet by Matt Taibbi describing how the Virality Project labeled audience responses to Drene Keyes' death as disinformation.

The Virality Project flagged a story about the death of an elderly black woman after receiving the Pfizer vaccine in Virginia because it “has received attention in anti-vax groups” and “the majority of top comments on the story are anti-vaccine.”

Text reading Notable Vaccine Side Effect/Adverse Event Stories highlighting reports on the death of Drene Keyes.

The Virality Project also claimed that people who were just “asking questions” were engaging in “a tactic commonly used by spreaders of misinformation to deflect culpability” and reportedly described a “Worldwide Rally for Freedom planned over Telegram” as a disinformation event.

Document excerpt mentioning Tucker Carlson and Sen. Ron Johnson with highlighted text on COVID-19 vaccine reactions.
Document excerpt tracking online vaccine discussions and Worldwide Rally for Freedom protest plans over Telegram.

Another technique the Virality Project used was to encourage Big Tech platforms to target people instead of posts using — something Taibbi described as “Minority Report-style ‘pre-crime’ logic.”

Tweet by Matt Taibbi describing platforms targeting people using Minority Report-style logic and naming Robert Kennedy, Jr.
Highlighted document text listing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Sherri Tenpenny as repeat offenders with reportable content.

The Virality Project was previously called the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) and under this previous name, it claimed to have successfully pushed for millions of tweets to be labeled in the run-up to the 2020 US presidential election.

Explore more on these topics