Scotland’s contentious “hate crime” legislation, widely criticized as an affront to free speech, is now in effect. Critics have voiced concerns that these new measures, while designed to address the alleged harm inflicted by hatred and bias, may inadvertently act as a tool to suppress freedom of speech and be abused.
Implemented on 1 April under the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act, the laws aim to bolster protections for individuals and communities vulnerable to hate crimes.
These laws offer a unifying structure that both consolidates current legislation and introduces new offenses. Now, any threatening or abusive conduct intended to inflame hate, rooted in prejudice towards various characteristics like age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, and transgender identity, constitutes wrongdoing.
The law, applicable even within the boundaries of private family homes, penalizes behavior devised to incite hatred, a provision previously only applicable to racial matters in Scotland.
Humza Yousaf, Scotland’s First Minister, stated emphatically that a “zero-tolerance approach” is needed to combat hate. He expressed his confidence in the police’s ability to handle investigations related to alleged hate.
The majority of the Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) approved the legislation in 2021. High-profile figures like J.K. Rowling and Elon Musk have publicly expressed their disapproval of the act, highlighting its threat to free speech.
A recent letter to Holyrood’s criminal justice committee from the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents (ASPS) raised concerns that an activist fringe might “weaponize” the law.
Police Scotland has pledged to examine every hate crime reported. The First Minister reaffirmed his “absolute faith” in the abilities of the police force to filter out frivolous complaints at the First Minister’s Questions session.
He dismissed criticism of the law as “disinformation,” alleging its compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights and its provision for an explicit clause safeguarding free speech, among other defenses.
Conservatives have called for the removal of the act, suggesting that the resources should instead be utilized for frontline policing. Russell Findlay MSP, the shadow justice secretary for the Scottish Conservatives, criticized the timing of the law’s implementation and its potential consequences for Scots.
Findlay also expressed dissatisfaction that many police officers have yet to receive training on the new law and voiced concerns about access to training material by the criminal justice committee.
Demonstrators have descended on the Scottish Parliament in a fervent outcry against the contentious legislation.
Protesters brazenly expressed their fears over the potential obstruction of freedom of speech. Some sported placards that asserted, “Truth isn’t hate speech,” and “Scotland opposes Humza’s hate crime bill.” Parallel sentiments were overtly stated with SNP logos plastered over taped mouths.
