Clicky

Defend free speech and individual liberty online. 

Push back against Big Tech and media gatekeepers.

EU Updates โ€œHate Speechโ€ Code Under Censorship Law, Big Tech Signs On

Tech giants face increasing scrutiny as the EU demands deeper transparency on hate speech regulation under the Digital Services Act.

Golden speech bubbles and stars on a textured blue background.

If youโ€™re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

The EU Commission and the Board for Digital Services have announced the revised Code of Conduct on Countering Illegal Hate Speech Online, which has been integrated into the EUโ€™s online censorship law, the Digital Services Act (DSA) regulatory framework (as one of the voluntary instruments).

Forbes reported, the code was signed by Dailymotion, Facebook, Instagram, Jeuxvideo.com, LinkedIn, Microsoft-hosted consumer services, Snapchat, Rakuten Viber, TikTok, Twitch, X, and YouTube, the Commission announced.

The document has its roots in 2016, when Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter and YouTube agreed to join, which was two years later followed by Instagram, Snapchat and Dailymotion, and then through 2021 by others.

The content thatโ€™s to be targeted is that which either the EU or member countries criminalize as hate speech.

A number of organizations (โ€œMonitoring Reportersโ€ โ€“ non-profits) in different EU member-countries are tasked with evaluating how these tech companies implement the code and live up to the commitments from it. Brussels describes the code as โ€œfacilitatingโ€ compliance with the DSA.

At the same time, it โ€œmay be considered as an appropriate risk mitigation measureโ€ for those tech companies that the DSA designates as Very Large Online Platforms (VLOPs) and Search Engines (VLOSEs).

The Commission and the Board now have recommendations for the signatories of the revised voluntary code, in order to implement it to the EUโ€™s satisfaction: one is to include information about the outcome of the measures they take in the companiesโ€™ reporting.

Next, they are expected to provide additional data regarding โ€œhate speechโ€ on their platforms, and this is supposed to go into the recommendation algorithms and how they affected the spread of content before it was removed.

The reports are also expected to have data concerning countries individually that explains how โ€œhate speechโ€ is internally classified, relating to categories like race, religion, gender equality, etc.

The Commission made sure to stress that while participating in voluntary instruments under the DSA and implementing these codes can play a role โ€“ this โ€œnonetheless does not in itself presume compliance with the DSA and is without prejudice to the Commissionโ€™s assessment on a case-by-case basis.โ€

In other words, the EU reserves the right to continue to try to tighten the screws on social media it dislikes, regardless of their participation in schemes like this one.

Currently, some of those under various types of investigation are X, Meta, and TikTok.

If youโ€™re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Reclaim The Net Logo

Defend free speech and individual liberty online. 

Push back against Big Tech and media gatekeepers.

Read more

USAID logo overlaid on an illustration of rows of laptops with colorful screens.

USAIDโ€™s Media Empire

The halt in USAID funding forces a reckoning on whether so-called โ€œindependentโ€ journalism should ever rely on Washingtonโ€™s wallet.