Accountability for Government Censorship Act

United StatesH.R.9133 (119th)Updated July 20, 2026

25%of the way to law
Good for your rightsIntroduced
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Became Law

Introduced; referred to the House Oversight Committee

Would force federal agencies to disclose their attempts to make platforms remove, suppress, label, or restrict access to lawful speech.

Latest update

Reclaim The Net examined the stronger remedies and continuing disclosure requirements proposed by the related JAWBONE Act

Take action

This bill is still moving, so there's still time to lend your support.

Contact Congress

The bill

Read the full billOfficial bill record

Key facts

Where
United States
Bill number
H.R.9133 (119th)
Status
Introduced
Introduced
June 3, 2026
Threat
Low
Last update
July 20, 2026

Topics

Share this bill

What it does

H.R.9133 would require every federal agency, including offices within the Executive Office of the President, to report platform communications during the preceding five years that sought to remove or suppress lawful speech, attach disclaimers or alerts to it, or restrict a person’s access to a platform. Agencies would identify the officials and platform employees involved, any claimed legal authority, the justification, the outcome, and coordinating agencies. OMB would compile the information for Congress, and agency inspectors general would review compliance. Core identifying information and claimed authority would have to remain unclassified, while other portions could appear in a classified annex.

What’s at stake

Government pressure can produce censorship without a statute, court order, or public record. Requiring agencies to identify who contacted a platform and what authority they claimed would expose part of that informal system and give Congress, journalists, and affected speakers evidence for oversight. The bill looks backward and requires disclosure; it does not prohibit future coercion, notify targeted speakers, publish the complete report, or create a remedy for people whose speech was suppressed.

Our take

We support exposing federal attempts to manipulate lawful online speech. The measure would be stronger with public disclosure of the full unclassified record, notice to targeted speakers, continuing reporting, and an enforceable remedy. Its reporting mandate complements the JAWBONE Act’s broader prohibition and cause of action.

Timeline

  1. Reclaim The Net examined the stronger remedies and continuing disclosure requirements proposed by the related JAWBONE ActLatest

  2. Introduced

The record

Sponsor

Scott Perry (R-PA)

Cosponsors (1)

W. Steube (R-FL)

Committee

Oversight and Government Reform Committee

Previous versions

118th