Apple Rolls Out Age Verification to UK iPhone Users Under Online Safety Act
Thanks to the British government, if you decline the prompt, you lose the ability to download apps.
Speech. Privacy. Liberty.
Expose Big Tech censorship, government overreach, and threats to online freedom. Join thousands fighting for digital liberty.
✔️ Unsubscribe anytime
Thanks to the British government, if you decline the prompt, you lose the ability to download apps.
The company selling privacy as a feature is now running age screening on 18+ app downloads without explaining what data makes that determination possible.
THE LATEST
member exclusives
A leaked dashboard screenshot reveals how commercial spyware silently installs via zero-click exploits to read encrypted messages and activate microphones.
Our list favors projects that hand you the keys to the infrastructure rather than another polished cage with different branding.
How you lock down your phone now matters as much as what’s on it.
What 2026 will really measure is how Linux can survive contact with non-enthusiasts.
The myth of “social media addiction” has become a convenient moral shield for expanding digital ID systems, turning concern for kids’ safety into consent for mass surveillance.
Encryption stands firm while everything surrounding it conspires to see through it.
True security starts where convenience ends, by keeping your encryption keys off the cloud and in your own hands.
The justices are about to decide whether carrying a smartphone means surrendering the Fourth Amendment.
Become a supporter and get unlimited access to investigations, analysis, and exclusive guides.
Colorado’s OS-level age verification bill sidesteps the failures that killed its predecessors by making Apple and Google do the heavy lifting and outsourcing the problem to a more powerful set of defendants.
The governor who couldn’t bring himself to say “put the phones down” at his own daughter’s party is now asking the state to say it for every family in California.
No outside arbiter, no independent review, no appeal before the fine lands; just the Commission, its definitions, and a $140 million bill. X is pushing back.
A federal judge just ruled that the public can’t know exactly how much the FBI paid Twitter during the years it was also telling Twitter which Americans to censor.
Zuckerberg spent five hours defending Instagram’s design choices, and walked out having handed legislators and regulators their preferred blueprint for a national digital ID system.
Brussels is pursuing Chat Control to surveil private communications while its own enforcers retreat deeper into encrypted, self-destructing ones.
Germany already has laws that let politicians prosecute citizens for insulting them online and Merz just wants to remove the last step between a critical post and a knock on the door.
The court gave researchers what they asked for, but the same institution that fined X for refusing is also the largest funder of the group that sued to make it comply.
The portal is Washington’s opening move in a direct confrontation with European governments over who gets to decide what their citizens can read.
Their voting records read like blueprints for the same surveillance state they’re asking taxpayers to help Iranians escape.
BIG TECH ALTERNATIVES
Speech. Privacy. Liberty.
Get news updates, features, and alternative tech explorations to defend your digital rights.
✔️ Unsubscribe anytime
