Free Speech

Every bill we’re tracking on free speech, with clear summaries of its provisions, status, and effects.

BadIntroducedUnited States

16 & Up Social Media Act

H.R. 10337 (119th) · United States
Introduced; referred to the House Energy and Commerce Committee

Would exclude under-16s from covered social platforms and pressure services to determine users' ages, threatening anonymous participation and lawful speech.

●●● High threatUpdated September 10, 2026Details →
BadLawUnited States

California Age-Estimation and Child Design Law (AB 2246)

California AB 2246 · United States · California
Signed; Chapter 187, Statutes of 2026

Orders services likely to attract children to estimate users' ages or treat everyone as a child, turning a law advertised as privacy protection into another mass-classification mandate.

●●● High threatUpdated September 10, 2026Details →
BadLawUnited States

California Social Media Child-Injury Liability Law (AB 2)

California AB 2 · United States · California
Signed; Chapter 180, Statutes of 2026

Uses vague negligence claims and damages of up to $1 million per child to pressure large platforms into suppressing lawful content and identifying which users are minors.

●●● High threatUpdated September 10, 2026Details →
BadIntroducedUnited States

Sunset Section 230 Act (H.R. 10332)

H.R. 10332 (119th) · United States

Would repeal Section 230 and make hosting other people's speech a legal hazard, driving forums and independent sites toward mass deletion, surveillance, or closure.

●●● High threatUpdated September 10, 2026Details →
BadIn progressAustralia

Australia Social Media Minimum Age Enforcement Bill

Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age Bill 2026 (48th Parliament) · Australia
Senate second reading agreed; Committee of the Whole debate

Expands eSafety’s information-gathering powers and doubles maximum civil penalties under Australia’s social media minimum-age framework.

●●● High threatUpdated September 9, 2026Details →
BadDraftAustralia

Australia Digital Duty of Care (Consultation Draft)

Australia
Draft released for targeted consultation; not yet introduced

A government consultation draft combining social-media feed choice with broader online-safety duties enforced by eSafety.

●●● High threatUpdated September 8, 2026Details →
GoodIntroducedUnited States

HOMEFRONT Act of 2026

H.R. 10309 (119th) · United States
Introduced; referred to the House Judiciary Committee

Would block US enforcement and government assistance for foreign censorship orders targeting constitutionally protected speech, while giving American targets a federal remedy.

●○○ Low threatUpdated September 8, 2026Details →
BadIn progressUnited States

California Worship Buffer-Zone Bill (AB 2664)

California AB 2664 · United States · California
Passed Legislature; engrossing and enrolling

Makes it a crime within 100 feet of a place of worship to approach within eight feet without consent to leaflet, display a sign, protest, or educate.

●●● High threatUpdated August 30, 2026Details →
GoodIntroducedUnited States

GRANITE Act

H.R.10174 (119th) · United States

Would block US courts from enforcing foreign censorship orders and let Americans seek a federal declaration that those demands are unenforceable.

●○○ Low threatUpdated August 27, 2026Details →
BadLawUnited States

New York S895B (Stop Hiding Hate Act)

New York S895B / A6789B · United States · New York
In force since June 19, 2025; X's challenge dismissed August 26, 2026, now on appeal

New York makes large social media companies file twice-yearly reports with the attorney general on how they define and police hate speech, misinformation, extremism, harassment and foreign political interference.

●●○ Medium threatUpdated August 26, 2026Details →
BadLawUnited States

California AB 2624 (“Stop Nick Shirley Act”)

California AB 2624 (2026) · United States · California
Signed into law; challenged in federal court

Shields immigration-support workers' addresses but also expands liability over publishing their names, images, employment details, and other broadly defined personal information.

●●○ Medium threatUpdated August 22, 2026Details →
BadIn progressUnited States

Parental Approval for Youth Social Media Act of 2026

S.5226 (119th) · United States
Introduced; referred to the Senate Commerce Committee

Would make social-media accounts for under-16s depend on verified parental permission, pressuring platforms to classify every user by age and connect children’s accounts to verified adults.

●●● High threatUpdated August 4, 2026Details →
BadIntroducedUnited Kingdom

Northern Ireland Conversion Practices Bill

NIA Bill 45/22-27 · United Kingdom · Northern Ireland
Introduced in the Northern Ireland Assembly; awaiting Second Stage

Criminal offences covering conversion practices raise speech concerns through broad definitions of therapy and psychological harm.

●●● High threatUpdated June 30, 2026Details →
GoodIntroducedUnited States

Accountability for Government Censorship Act

H.R.9133 (119th) · United States
Introduced; referred to the House Oversight Committee

Would force federal agencies to disclose their attempts to make platforms remove, suppress, label, or restrict access to lawful speech.

●○○ Low threatUpdated June 3, 2026Details →
MixedIn progressAustralia

Australia Fix Our Feeds Bill

Fix Our Feeds Bill 2026 (48th Parliament) · Australia
Before Senate; second reading moved April 1, 2026

Would let social-media users switch off algorithmic recommendations and impose wider platform risk-assessment and reporting duties.

●●○ Medium threatUpdated April 1, 2026Details →
BadLawAustralia

Australia Hate and Extremism Act 2026

Act No. 2 of 2026 · Australia
Law; prohibited-hate-group listing powers in force

Creates an executive blacklist for prohibited hate groups and criminalizes membership, recruitment, funding, and support, extending state power from violent acts to association and expression.

●●● High threatUpdated January 21, 2026Details →
BadLawUnited States

California Election Deepfake Law (AB 2839)

California AB 2839 · United States · California
Held unconstitutional; permanent injunction protects named plaintiffs

California’s election-deepfake restrictions were held unconstitutional in August 2025; the permanent injunction bars enforcement against the named plaintiffs.

●●● High threatUpdated August 29, 2025Details →

All tracked bills