California Age-Appropriate Design Code

California, United StatesCalifornia AB 2273 (2022)Updated April 3, 2026

100%became law
Bad for your rightsLaw
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Became Law

Partly in force: age-estimation duty unblocked April 2026; data-use and dark-pattern rules still enjoined

California's design-code law makes platforms estimate users' ages and reshape their products for minors. Courts have partly blocked it.

Latest update

Ninth Circuit mandate issued; age-estimation duty enforceable

Take action

Learn about the issue and how to make your position known.

Take action on this issue

The bill

Read the full billOfficial bill record

Key facts

Where
California, United States
Bill number
California AB 2273 (2022)
Status
Law
Introduced
February 18, 2022
Threat
High
Last update
April 3, 2026

Topics

Share this bill

What it does

The Age-Appropriate Design Code makes online services likely to be used by children either estimate the age of their users with a reasonable level of certainty or apply the child privacy protections to every user. Minors get the strongest privacy and safety settings by default. The code gives the state a hand in how products are designed.

What’s at stake

This is the design-code model, copied by Maryland, Vermont, and Nebraska. The Ninth Circuit gave a split ruling in NetChoice v. Bonta, striking some data and dark-pattern rules on vagueness grounds but reviving the age-estimation requirement, so the age-checking core is still alive.

Our take

Age estimation is age verification with a softer name. Even where courts trimmed the law, the part that makes platforms guess how old you are survived, and that is the part that ends anonymous browsing.

Timeline

  1. Ninth Circuit mandate issued; age-estimation duty enforceableLatest

  2. Ninth Circuit vacated the injunction against the age-estimation requirement; data-use and dark-pattern rules stay enjoined

The record

Votes

  • Assembly: Passed unanimously, August 30, 2022
  • Senate: Passed unanimously, August 30, 2022

Legal challenges

NetChoice v. Bonta

Second Ninth Circuit ruling, March 12, 2026: vacated the injunction against the age-estimation requirement and the Act as a whole; affirmed it against the data-use and dark-pattern rules as likely vague. Mandate issued April 3, 2026. The provisions tied to impact assessments stay enjoined under the 2024 ruling.