Nebraska Parental Rights in Social Media Act (LB 383)

BadLawNebraska LB 383Nebraska, United StatesMedium threat
Age checks enjoined; parental surveillance dashboard stands; cross-appeals at the Eighth Circuit
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Became Law

Stage 4 of 4: Became Law

Nebraska's social media age-check law was blocked days before taking effect. The part that survived forces platforms to hand parents their kids' private messages.

Latest update

NetChoice cross-appealed the ruling that left the parental access provisions in force (No. 26-2486)

Read the full billView official bill record

Take action

Learn about the issue and how to make your position known.

Take action on this issue

What it does

Signed in May 2025 and set to start July 1, 2026, LB 383 required social media platforms to verify every new account holder's age through a third-party vendor and to get express parental consent before a minor could open an account. On June 27, days before the start date, a federal judge blocked both requirements as likely First Amendment violations. What he left standing is the dashboard mandate: platforms must give parents access to all of a minor's posts, interactions, and private messages.

What’s at stake

The blocked half is the familiar story. The surviving half is not: a court just let stand a legal mandate that platforms build surveillance dashboards over minors' private messages. A Nebraska teen's private messages now come with a state-required second reader. That precedent travels even if the age checks stay dead.

Our take

The headline says Nebraska lost, and for the ID checks it did. But look at what is now law: platforms must wire every minor's private conversations into a monitoring panel. Protecting kids by ending their private communication is the same trade digital ID laws offer, and this version survived court. Watch which states copy the dashboard instead of the age gate.

Timeline

NetChoice cross-appealed the ruling that left the parental access provisions in force (No. 26-2486)Latest

Attorney General appealed the injunction to the Eighth Circuit (No. 26-2478)

Surviving provisions took effect

Age-verification and parental-consent provisions enjoined; dashboard mandate left in force

Signed by Governor Pillen

Votes

  • Legislature — Final reading (46 to 3) · May 14, 2025

Legal challenges

NetChoice v. Hilgers

Judge Gerrard (D. Neb.) enjoined the age-verification and parental-consent provisions on June 27, 2026 and left the parental access provisions in force. Both sides appealed: the attorney general on July 23, 2026 (8th Cir. No. 26-2478) and NetChoice on July 24, 2026 (8th Cir. No. 26-2486). The district case is stayed.