Topic: Missouri v. Biden
Missouri v. Biden highlights the troubling collaboration between the government and social media platforms to suppress free speech. The case reveals how government pressure has led to censorship of protected speech, raising serious concerns about individual liberties and the integrity of public discourse. This situation highlights the need for vigilance against government overreach and the erosion of free expression in the internet era.
-
Dressen v. Flaherty: Vaccine Censorship Case Goes to Appeal
The support group was a safe room online, so Washington leaned on the platforms until the door shut.
-
US State Dept Settles Free Speech Suppression Lawsuit
A federal agency spent taxpayer money telling Americans which news outlets to trust, and it took three years of litigation…
-
Missouri v. Biden Consent Decree: US Government Admits Pressuring Social Media Platforms to Censor Protected Speech
The administration that inherited the lawsuit just signed away its predecessor’s censorship playbook in a binding legal document.
-
Biden “Cheap Fakes” Defense Under Fire After Hill Testimony
The hearing peeled back the veneer on a messaging machine struggling to control the story even as the footage told…
-
Google Admits Biden White House Pressured Content Removal, Promises to Restore Banned YouTube Accounts
Google admits bending to political pressure, but only long after the damage was already done.
-
Jim Jordan Subpoenas FBI: Unraveling Biden Admin’s Big Tech Collusion
Jordan demands FBI records on Big Tech ties, seeking full transparency on censorship efforts.
-
Judge Pauses Murthy v. Missouri Amid Trump’s Free Speech Order
The case’s future hangs in the balance as the court weighs whether Trump’s executive order renders it moot.
-
HHS Secretary Becerra Defends Biden Admin’s Big Tech Censorship, Blames Disinformation for Public Distrust
Becerra blames “instantaneous misinformation” for public distrust, sidestepping the government’s own role in pandemic-era censorship.
-
Mark Zuckerberg Calls Biden Administration’s Pressure to Censor COVID-19 Content “Illegal”
But made no legal attempts to challenge the censorship demands.
-
Shocking Report Reveals US Officials Suppressed Lab Leak Evidence Leading to Social Media Censorship
Government suppression and Big Tech collusion reshaped the COVID-19 origin debate, sidelining key intelligence in favor of an official narrative.
-
Senator Eric Schmitt Urges Exclusion of State Department’s Global Engagement Center from Government Funding
The agency faces scrutiny for alleged involvement in suppressing dissenting views online.
-
Court Advances Hines v. Stamos Case Alleging Government-Backed Censorship of Covid-19 and Election Speech
US District Court allows Hines v. Stamos case to proceed, focusing on alleged collusion in censoring online speech and First…