Clicky

Defend free speech and individual liberty online. 

Push back against Big Tech and media gatekeepers.

Australiaโ€™s eSafety Commissioner Defends Controversial Online Age Verification Digital ID Methods

Australia's eSafety Commissioner defends age verification measures under the 2024 Social Media Minimum Age Bill, sparking global debate on privacy and surveillance.

Julie Inman Grant with long blonde hair wearing an orange top and a necklace, seated indoors with a blurred background.

If youโ€™re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Julie Inman Grant, Australiaโ€™s eSafety Commissioner (to her critics โ€“ the countryโ€™s chief censor), has attempted to explain how Online Safety Amendment โ€“ Social Media Minimum Age Bill 2024 โ€“ will be enforced.

The bill mandates online age verification, and bans minors under 16 from using social platforms, in what is described as โ€œthe strictest crackdownโ€ yet in the world โ€“ with many in the world, no doubt, looking at how things pan out in Australia before they make their own restrictive moves.

The โ€œsmallโ€ question that remains to be answered Down Under now is โ€“ how does the government propose to determine the age of a person using an online platform, before the government orders them to be banned?

Grant may be trying to sell one method as less invasive, less potentially harmful, and otherwise controversial than another โ€“ but they appear to be as bad as each other, only in different ways.

โ€œThere are really only three ways you can verify someoneโ€™s age online, and thatโ€™s through ID, through behavioral signals, or through biometrics,โ€ she told NPR.

The โ€œIDโ€ route means that every internet user would have to provide government-issued documents to platforms, revealing their real-world identity to these platforms and anyone else theyโ€™re in business with (such as governments and data brokers) and ending online anonymity for everyone.

And that, in fact, is the only sure-fire way to determine someoneโ€™s age. The other two produce estimates. The biometrics Grant mentions refer to uploading selfies to companies like Yoti, who then guess a userโ€™s age.

Related: The 2024 Digital ID and Online Age Verification Agenda

Better than the โ€œIDโ€ method โ€“ that is, if you believe itโ€™s a good idea for minors, or anyone, to just hand over biometric data to third parties.

Then, there are โ€œbehavioral signalsโ€ โ€“ and it sounds positively bonkers that a government would entertain the idea of deploying such technology on/against its citizens.

Grant said she met with yet another third party in the US โ€“ โ€œan age assurance providerโ€ โ€“ this unnamed company doesnโ€™t monitor and analyze your facial features, but hand gestures. For age verification.

Like so: โ€œSay you do a peace sign then a fist to the camera. It follows your hand movements. And medical research has shown that based on your hand movement, it can identify your age.โ€

One way to look at all this is that tech is being developed to step up online surveillance, while a flurry of โ€œthink of the childrenโ€ laws may be here to legitimize and โ€œlegalizeโ€ that techโ€™s use.

If youโ€™re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Reclaim The Net Logo

Defend free speech and individual liberty online. 

Push back against Big Tech and media gatekeepers.

Read more

USAID logo overlaid on an illustration of rows of laptops with colorful screens.

USAIDโ€™s Media Empire

The halt in USAID funding forces a reckoning on whether so-called โ€œindependentโ€ journalism should ever rely on Washingtonโ€™s wallet.