Australia Misinformation Bill (Withdrawn)
What it does
The bill would have empowered ACMA, the communications regulator, to police how platforms handle misinformation and disinformation: mandatory record-keeping, approved codes, and penalties tied to global turnover. Government communications and professional news content were exempt from the definition, so the regime pointed at what ordinary people post. It passed the House in November 2024 and was withdrawn on November 24 when the government conceded the Senate would not pass it.
Why it matters
Australia got closer than any comparable democracy to a statutory misinformation regulator, and the exemptions showed the shape: official speech protected, citizen speech assessed. The withdrawal was a vote-counting retreat, and the idea resurfaces in every DSA-style systemic-risk framework.
Our take
A truth regulator whose own government was exempt from scrutiny died of exposure, and the same architecture keeps returning under calmer names. This entry stays as the record of the version that said it plainly.
Timeline
- September 12, 2024Introduced in the House
- November 7, 2024Passed the House
- November 24, 2024Withdrawn; the Senate votes were not there
Related bills
Our coverage: all censorship stories