Topic: Science Feedback
Science Feedback refers to the practice of fact-checking content related to scientific topics, often resulting in censorship on platforms like Facebook and YouTube. This process raises significant concerns about free speech and the potential for biased assessments to suppress legitimate discourse, particularly regarding controversial issues like vaccines and public health. The actions of fact-checkers can lead to deplatforming and restrictions on users, undermining individual liberty and the open exchange of ideas.
-
Judges Back Meta in Vaccine “Misinformation” Battle, Free Speech Advocates Vow to Fight On
Meta wins in court, but dissent raises alarm over government involvement in social media censorship.
-
Court: Facebook “fact-check” label does not mean that the assessment is “objective fact”
A case against a fact checker has been dismissed.
-
“Fact checkers” gang up to demand YouTube censors more “misinformation”
Piling on the pressure.
-
-
Facebook censors Wuhan lab whistleblower Li-Meng Yan
Censored by a “fact-check.”
-
Facebook’s fact-checkers accused of censorship over mask-wearing in kids
The Manhattan Institute says their “fact-checking” is actually “fact-blocking.”
-
Children’s Health Defense sues Facebook and fact-checkers for censoring its content
The group alleges Facebook suppresses its factual content and marks it as false.
-
Warren and other Dems ask Zuckerberg why he’s not fact checking people’s opinions
The senators think Facebook refusing to fact-check opinions is a “loophole.”
-
Facebook restricts PragerU’s page and limits the reach of its posts after disputed fact-check
Facebook’s fact checkers have been accused of bias and using the feature as a censorship tool.