Clicky

Join the pushback against online censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance.

UK Government Dodges Real Issues by Promising Even Stricter Censorship Laws

Officials hint at further crackdowns, sidestepping mounting concerns over free speech and international tensions.

Abstract artwork featuring the Union Jack flag with colorful speech bubbles scattered across, creating a dynamic and textured composition.

If youโ€™re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Itโ€™s anybodyโ€™s guess at this point: Are the UKโ€™s majority lawmakers oblivious, defiant, or for some other reason, known only to themselves โ€“ โ€œfeeling themselvesโ€?

Amid myriad controversies centered on the way the countryโ€™s government(s) have been choosing to treat free speech online for a while now โ€“ the โ€œpinnacleโ€ of which should have been the highly controversial Online Safety Act โ€“ reports now say there are UK parliament members who want yet more censorship laws to be enacted.

But tripling down, at this particular moment in domestic and international politics, why? To what end?

For a cabinet under all sorts of pressure, it might just be a matter of coming up with a negotiating stance, as the figurative waves keep crashing in.

Hereโ€™s Minister of State for Data Protection and Telecoms and Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism Chris Bryant โ€“ always, at this point embarrassingly, falling back on the nebulous โ€œthink-of-the-childrenโ€ platitude โ€“ while sounding like heโ€™s โ€œsoothingโ€ not only his voters but also himself:

โ€œI do not doubt for a single instant that this will be the end of the story, that the Online Safety Act will be the end of the story. I will be amazed if there werenโ€™t further legislation in this field in some shape or other in the next two or three years.โ€

One could choose to look at this flurry of very recent comments from UK officials as vying to gain a โ€œstrongโ€ (if thatโ€™s possible at this point) negotiating position with the new US administration (which has not been shy to lump in trade tariffs with abuses of free speech).

So the UK officials at this point โ€“ instead of addressing the issues at hand โ€“ appear to be trying to talk themselves out of the huge predicament that the Online Safety Act is.

Namely, by โ€œthreateningโ€ it could get much worse.

And they go very shallow to appear to be deeply trying to dive into their self-imposed โ€œvirtuousโ€ online rhetoric โ€“ Liberal Democrat MP Caroline Voaden found it within herself to complain that the Online Safety Act, such as it is, does not properly deal with things like, โ€œthe myths of the perfect body.โ€

Talk to the ancient Greeks, not social media, MP Voaden โ€“ they were the first to come up with that โ€œmythโ€ thousands of years ago.

But to avoid real-world political issues now at hand, threats are made of making the Online Safety Act even worse than it is, for any number of often flimsy โ€œreasons.โ€