Maryland Kids Code (HB 603)

Maryland, United StatesMaryland HB 603 (2024)Updated July 7, 2026

100%became law
Bad for your rightsLaw
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Became Law

In force; NetChoice challenge moving ahead

Maryland's copy of California's design code has been in force since 2024 while NetChoice tries to kill it in court.

Latest update

Court granted leave to file a second amended complaint adding a Commerce Clause claim

Take action

Learn about the issue and how to make your position known.

Take action on this issue

The bill

Read the full billOfficial bill record

Key facts

Where
Maryland, United States
Bill number
Maryland HB 603 (2024)
Status
Law
Threat
High
Last update
July 7, 2026

Topics

Share this bill

What it does

Online services reasonably likely to be accessed by anyone under 18 must complete data protection impact assessments (the first were due April 1, 2026), set high privacy by default, and design their products in the best interests of children. It took effect October 1, 2024. NetChoice sued in February 2025 on First Amendment and preemption grounds; the court denied Maryland's motion to dismiss on November 24, 2025, and on July 7, 2026, the court granted NetChoice’s April request to add a Commerce Clause claim in a second amended complaint. There is no injunction, so the law applies now.

What’s at stake

California's version of this law got enjoined. Maryland's is the live test of whether a redrafted design code survives the First Amendment, and every state considering a kids code is watching this docket.

Our take

Reasonably likely to be accessed by minors describes most of the internet, and best interests of children means whatever a regulator decides it means. To know which users get the child treatment, every covered site has to estimate every visitor's age. The privacy law makes the sites watch you more closely.

Timeline

  1. Court granted leave to file a second amended complaint adding a Commerce Clause claimLatest

  2. First data protection impact assessments due

  3. Court denied Maryland's motion to dismiss the NetChoice challenge

  4. Took effect

The record

Votes

  • House: Third reading (135 to 0), March 14, 2024
  • Senate: Third reading (47 to 0), April 3, 2024

Legal challenges

NetChoice v. Brown

Motion to dismiss denied November 2025; leave to file a second amended complaint adding a Commerce Clause claim granted July 7, 2026. That procedural order did not enjoin the law.