Clicky

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Florida Judge Rules Brazilian Censorship Orders Unenforceable Against Rumble and Trump Media

The judge's ruling reinforces that foreign censorship demands cannot bypass US legal protections.

Green play button icon and blue circle with a white symbol, against a blurred background with hints of a flag.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

A federal judge in Florida has denied a request from Trump Media and video platform Rumble to block enforcement of orders issued by Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, ruling that the case is not yet ripe for judicial review.

We obtained a copy of the order for you here.

However – thatโ€™s not because Rumble and Trump Mediaย  have no grounds – itโ€™s because both companies โ€œwere not served upon Plaintiffs in compliance with the Hague Convention, to which the United States and Brazil are both signatories nor were they served pursuant to the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty between the United States and Brazil.โ€

The two platforms have been at the forefront in the fight against censorship. In a win for free speech, the court ruled that the direct demands of Rumble and Truth are not through โ€œestablished protocolsโ€ and so Plaintiffs [Rumble and Truth] are not obligated to comply with the directives and pronouncements, and no one is authorized or obligated to assist in their enforcement against Plaintiffs or their interests here in the United States.โ€

The immediate dispute revolves around a conservative Brazilian commentator living in the US, referred to in the lawsuit as Political Dissident A. This commentator, a vocal critic of the Brazilian Supreme Court, has been accused of โ€œanti-democraticโ€ speechโ€”a charge that US courts would almost certainly dismiss as constitutionally protected under the First Amendment.

US District Judge Mary S. Scriven effectively stated that the two platforms do not need a temporary restraining order against Moraes because Moraeโ€™s orders to Rumble have no grounds.

In a statement, a Rumble spokesperson stated: โ€œThe court explicitly ruled that Moraesโ€™s directives were never properly served under US or international lawโ€ฆโ€ and that โ€œThe court further made clear that if anyone attempts to enforce these illegal orders on US soil, it stands ready to intervene to protect American companies and free speech. The ruling sends a strong message to foreign governments that they cannot bypass US law to impose censorship on American platforms.โ€

โ€œThis is a major victory for free speech and free expression online,โ€ said Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes. โ€œThe ruling confirms that would-be dictators in any country canโ€™t force Trump Media or Rumble to censor their opponents. We congratulate our partner Rumble on its principled stand for freedom.โ€

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Share this post