Freedom of Speech Requires Freedom of Reach

Why "freedom of speech, not freedom of reach" is a flawed argument.

X CEO Linda Yaccarino recently made headlines for talking out of both sides of her mouth. On the one hand she professes to be supporting free speech. On the other hand, she uses the tired, cliche, and sinister phrase of โ€œfreedom of speech but not freedom of reach,โ€ one of the ways that has been used to justify censorship throughout history.

The policy is one where users, when posting narratives that are not in line with approved standards, are labeled, possibly demonetized for that content, and have their visibility reduced on the platform.

Red shield logo with three stylized black and white arrows curving outward, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in grey and 'THE NET' in red

Become a Member and Keep Reading…

Reclaim your digital freedom. Get the latest on censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance, and learn how to fight back.

Already a supporter? Sign In.
(If you’re already logged in but still seeing this, refresh this page to show the post.)
Having trouble logging in? Get help here.

More you should know:

Share this post