Clicky

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Regulator told banks to stop doing business with the NRA “or else.” The Supreme Court is asked to weigh in.

A First Amendment case.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

Sean Reyes, the Attorney General of the state of Utah, has joined 18 other attorneys general calling on the US Supreme Court to reverse a decision by the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the National Rifle Association (NRA) against the former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services Maria Vullo.

Vullo told financial institutions to stop doing business with the NRA โ€œor else.โ€

In an amicus brief, the attorneys general said that Vullo violated the First Amendment rights of the NRA, and “engaged in a politically motivated campaign against the financial institutions doing business with the NRA but steered clear of any explicit threats.โ€

We obtained a copy of the amicus brief for you here.

The attorneys general asked the Supreme Court to protect the free speech rights of the NRA and others.

They also argued that courts have generally sided with organizations and individuals instead of the government in similar cases.

“But in this case, the Second Circuit flipped this approach on its head, effectively requiring a government official to explicitly threatened adverse consequences before any First Amendment violation occurs, even if any interested party would understand a state officialโ€™s words or conduct as an implied threat,” Utahโ€™s attorney generalโ€™s office wrote in a press release.

The coalition of attorney generals argued that the decision by the lower court would allow the government to censor speech that it does not like.

โ€œIf the Second Circuitโ€™s decision is left standing, itโ€™s not difficult to imagine government officials employing similar tactics to stifle disfavored speakers. Whether the method of choice is to target financial institutions that advocacy groups depend on to engage in fulsome political advocacyโ€ฆor simply to target private organizations that host events for such groups, the path forward is clearly marked,โ€ the attorneys general wrote in the brief. โ€œAnd if this Court doesnโ€™t intervene to shut down that path, โ€˜where would such official bullying end?’โ€

The amicus brief was filed by Utah, Montana, Georgia, Ohio, Iowa, Arkansas, Alabama, Missouri, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Kansas, Louisiana, North Dakota, Kentucky, South Dakota, Wyoming, Oklahoma, South Dakota, West Virginia, and South Carolina.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Share this post