How Digital Convenience Becomes a Government Backdoor

The Supreme Court's silence keeps 20th-century privacy rules firmly in place while 21st-century surveillance marches on.

Close-up of a human eye with green digital binary code superimposed over the iris, creating a futuristic and technological effect.

The Supreme Court has once again reminded Americans that digital privacy is the kind of quaint notion best left in textbooks. With no explanation, no debate, and no visible effort, the justices decided they didn’t feel like dealing with Harper v. Faulkender.

This was the case that could have dragged Fourth Amendment protections out of the rotary phone era and into a world where people actually use crypto and digital wallets and more. But apparently, that was too much work.

Red shield logo with three stylized black and white arrows curving outward, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in grey and 'THE NET' in red

Become a Member and Keep Reading…

Reclaim your digital freedom. Get the latest on censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance, and learn how to fight back.

Already a supporter? Sign In.
(If you’re already logged in but still seeing this, refresh this page to show the post.)
Having trouble logging in? Get help here.

More you should know:

Share this post