Clicky

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Telegram refuses to provide governments details on its users – even on terrorists

Many have commended Telegram to its commitments to privacy - but some have suggested it should make exceptions for terrorist incidents.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

Telegram, an instant messaging app has recently denied to handover the chat details of the ISIS module Ansar-ul-Khilafah Kerala in spite of constant and repeated queries from Indiaโ€™s NIA (National Investigation Agency). It is strange to note that the messaging company would deny disclosing the records of a terrorist operative.

During the trial of the moduleโ€™s alleged members, it was reported that the NIAโ€™s presiding judge, P. Krishna Kumar had asked NIA if they attempted to contact Telegram for retrieving chat data. The prosecutor, Arjun Ambalapatta then replied stating that Telegram did not respond to official communication and did not reveal any details about the users and channels.

According to New India Express, while avoiding communication and refusing to share data might come off as an unethical or a borderline illegal activity, it is however completely legal from the companyโ€™s standpoint.

The intermediary liability and OTT services have highlighted a few reasons as to why companies such as Telegram are not liable to communicate or share data with the Indian government:

1. The company, as well as its servers, are located outside India, meaning that Telegram is no longer under the jurisdiction of India. It is common to note that several tech entities have their parent companies or organizations operating from a foreign company.
2. For several services such as Telegram, there are no representatives in India for any official communication and representation of these companies.
3. The encryption keys for these chats are usually stored outside India, which again makes it nearly impossible for the companyโ€™s officials to get a grip on such encryption keys.

For tackling problems like these in the future, the country is now drafting a regulatory framework for OTT services and is also considering making amendments to the intermediary liability rules.

The country is also planning on incorporating large foreign platforms under their laws and appointing a nodal officer to coordinate with law enforcement agencies. This way, India expects to bring foreign entities under its reach to implement the laws effectively.

Over the past year, several Indian ISPs have blocked access to Telegramโ€™s web version. Telegram has also been blocked in Russia in 2018 after the app refused to hand over encryption keys in connection with a terror attackโ€™s investigation. Telegram is know for its commitment to privacy.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Share this post