Topic: Institute for Strategic Dialogue
The Institute for Strategic Dialogue is involved in promoting censorship initiatives that undermine free speech and individual liberties. Its connections to government funding and advocacy for stricter content regulations raise concerns about the impact on independent media and the rights of individuals to express dissenting views. This highlights the ongoing struggle against censorship and surveillance in the digital environment.
-
Key Group in Government-Linked Censorship Network Boasted of Defunding News Outlets
The real triumph wasn’t in foreign policy but in rebranding domestic censorship as national security strategy.
-
FOIA Requests Target Biden Administration’s Financial Surveillance
FOIA requests target Treasury, FBI, and DHS over alleged financial surveillance of conservatives and coordination with private organizations.
-
World Economic Forum Panel Praises EU Censorship Law
Panel hails EU’s Digital Services Act as essential for tackling online “misinformation.”
-
Maricopa Recorder’s Email Trail Sparks Controversy Over Censorship War
Email records reveal Arizona’s Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer enlisted help from ideologically charged groups, raising concerns over the neutrality…
-
UK Think Tank, Once Funded by US State Department, Calls for Stricter YouTube Censorship
The Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a UK think tank that was in 2021 awarded a grant by the US…
-
Democrats Ignore The First Amendment With Censorship Demand Letter To X
Demands to censor online speech.
-
House GOP probes State Department’s censorship ties to social media giants
An investigation into outsourcing censorship to third-parties.
-
US State Department funds UK think tank that aids in censorship of Americans
The Institute for Strategic Dialogue partners with Big Tech.
-
Spotify Creates “safety advisory council” to advise on “hate speech,” “disinformation”
A similar tactic to Facebook.
-
Jason Miller hits back at Politico hit piece on GETTR
Miller accused Politico of not disclosing the organization whose research they quoted is funded by Big Tech.











