Judge Pauses Murthy v. Missouri Amid Trump’s Free Speech Order
February 13, 2025
The case’s future hangs in the balance as the court weighs whether Trump’s executive order renders it moot.
The case’s future hangs in the balance as the court weighs whether Trump’s executive order renders it moot.
The $5 million NSF grant to GWU raises concerns over government-backed speech regulation and selective expert protection.
“Under the Biden administration, we’ve seen the rise of what many are calling Operation Choke Point 2.0, where federal regulators exploited their power, pressuring banks to cut off services to individuals and businesses with conservative dispositions, or folks aligned with industries they just didn’t like.”
Gabbard’s steadfast stance reflects her long-held commitment to civil liberties and government transparency.
DeepSeek offers open-source generative AI with localized data storage but raises concerns over censorship, privacy, and disruption of Western markets.
His own record on censorship casts a shadow.
Berenson claims new evidence links Pfizer and White House pressure to his Twitter ban, raising the stakes in his free speech battle.
Behind the efforts by Biden’s team during the 2020 campaign to label discussions on his mental decline as “disinformation.”
The battle intensifies as California’s governor moves to legislate against AI misuse, sparking a free speech debate with Elon Musk.
Labeling critical media footage as misinformation ignites debate over election integrity and media manipulation.
New funding for shaping online narratives.
President Biden is currently pushing back against an injunction that blocked him from censoring online speech.
Vowing to continue pushing for censorship, despite similar Biden admin actions being challenged in court.
Millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on programs that target speech.
Partially upholding the injunction.
New allegations.
The problem with AI content moderation.
It should be easy to accept considering the First Amendment.
YouTube recently reversed its election “misinformation” policy.
Revelations from the lawsuit against the Biden administration.
Unelected bureaucrats back plans to give the WHO increased powers.
The White House’s plan to tackle antisemitism is to make online platforms “accountable.”
A “choose your own adventure” style game-like memo using tax-payer’s money.
The case’s future hangs in the balance as the court weighs whether Trump’s executive order renders it moot.
The $5 million NSF grant to GWU raises concerns over government-backed speech regulation and selective expert protection.
“Under the Biden administration, we’ve seen the rise of what many are calling Operation Choke Point 2.0, where federal regulators exploited their power, pressuring banks to cut off services to individuals and businesses with conservative dispositions, or folks aligned with industries they just didn’t like.”
Gabbard’s steadfast stance reflects her long-held commitment to civil liberties and government transparency.
DeepSeek offers open-source generative AI with localized data storage but raises concerns over censorship, privacy, and disruption of Western markets.
His own record on censorship casts a shadow.
Berenson claims new evidence links Pfizer and White House pressure to his Twitter ban, raising the stakes in his free speech battle.
Behind the efforts by Biden’s team during the 2020 campaign to label discussions on his mental decline as “disinformation.”
The battle intensifies as California’s governor moves to legislate against AI misuse, sparking a free speech debate with Elon Musk.
Labeling critical media footage as misinformation ignites debate over election integrity and media manipulation.
New funding for shaping online narratives.
President Biden is currently pushing back against an injunction that blocked him from censoring online speech.
Vowing to continue pushing for censorship, despite similar Biden admin actions being challenged in court.
Millions of taxpayer dollars being spent on programs that target speech.
Partially upholding the injunction.
New allegations.
The problem with AI content moderation.
It should be easy to accept considering the First Amendment.
YouTube recently reversed its election “misinformation” policy.
Revelations from the lawsuit against the Biden administration.
Unelected bureaucrats back plans to give the WHO increased powers.
The White House’s plan to tackle antisemitism is to make online platforms “accountable.”
A “choose your own adventure” style game-like memo using tax-payer’s money.
