Defend free speech and individual liberty online. 

Push back against big tech and media gatekeepers.

Twitter asks judge to dismiss lawsuit from President Trump

On First Amendment grounds.
If you're tired of censorship, cancel culture, and the erosion of civil liberties subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Twitter asked a federal judge to dismiss Trump’s lawsuit over his permanent suspension from the platform for “inciting” the protest at the US Capitol on January 6. Twitter argued that, as a private entity, it did not have host speech it didn’t agree with.

A few months ago, Trump launched lawsuits against the platforms that suspended him following the January 6 protest, including Twitter, which was his favorite platform. He accused Twitter of violating his First Amendment free speech rights and silencing conservative voices.

On Thursday, Twitter argued in court that the lawsuit was a threat to its free speech rights. It argued that it is a private company that is not obligated to host speech it doesn’t agree with.

We obtained a copy of the filing for you here.

The defense said “that Twitter is a private actor that is not constrained by the federal constitution.” It added, the government “cannot force the private operator of an online platform, such as Twitter, to disseminate speech with which the operator disagrees.”

The platform also justified the ban by claiming it was an editorial choice stirred by public concerns of statements that could “further violence” and threaten the peaceful transition of power.

Twitter also noted that Trump repeatedly violated its terms of service, which he agreed to follow when he registered his account.

Trump’s lawyer John Coale argued Twitter is a “state actor,” not a private actor. He cited Section 230, the law that gives online platforms legal immunity over their moderation decisions. Coale said that immunity comes with a subsidy that obligates platforms to respect free speech rights.

“If they didn’t have that immunity and they were doing what they do now, they’d have billions of dollars in judgments against them,” Coale said in a phone interview on Friday. “Take away that immunity and they’d have 100,000 lawsuits a week.”

In the Thursday hearing, the Justice Department intervened as a friend of the court. It argued that Section 230 does not give Twitter the right to regulate the speech of the former presidents.

“Instead, the statute establishes a content- and viewpoint-neutral rule prohibiting liability for certain conduct by providers of interactive computer services.”

Meanwhile, Trump is coming back to social media. He launched his own platform, Truth Social, where he says conservatives and others can voice their opinions without fear of censorship.

If you're tired of censorship, cancel culture, and the erosion of civil liberties subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Defend free speech and individual liberty online. 

Push back against big tech and media gatekeepers.

Push back against online censorship, 

cancel culture, and privacy invasion. 

Informed by principles on digital rights.

Share

MindsGabGettr