Clicky

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Federal Judge Orders UO to Pay $191K to PSU Professor Blocked for “All Men Are Created Equal” Comment

A $724,000 reminder that quoting the Declaration of Independence can still start a war in higher education.

Abstract image of large yellow speech bubbles on a textured blue background with visible brush strokes and distressed areas.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

The University of Oregon is facing the financial consequences of an unconstitutional attempt to suppress speech after a federal judge ordered it to pay $191,000 in legal fees to Portland State University professor Bruce Gilley.

The order, issued by US District Judge John V. Acosta, follows a settlement reached in March 2025 in which the university acknowledged Gilleyโ€™s comments should not have been censored and agreed to implement major policy reforms.

The legal fees, which will be covered by UOโ€™s insurer United Educators, include $147,070 awarded to the Institute for Free Speech (IFS) and $43,930 to the Angus Lee Law Firm.

These payments, combined with more than $533,000 that the university had already spent on its own legal representation by late 2024, push the cost of defending its actions to at least $724,000.

That figure excludes further expenses accrued since November.

These high costs are directly tied to UOโ€™s decision to support its DEI officials after they blocked Gilley for replying โ€œall men are created equalโ€ to a university post on X.

This fee award reflects the substantial resources required to vindicate fundamental constitutional rights in the digital age, as well as the vigor with which the University of Oregon chose to defend unconstitutional policies,” said Del Kolde, IFS Senior Attorney.

“The university made a costly decision to prioritize DEI principles over constitutional principles, aggressively litigating this case for nearly three years rather than acknowledging the obvious, that blocking someone for quoting the Declaration of Independence violates the First Amendment.”

The conflict began in June 2022, when Gilley reposted a UO โ€œracism interrupterโ€ message and added the phrase from the Declaration of Independence.

After UOโ€™s Division of Equity and Inclusion blocked him, Gilley challenged the move in court. A July 2024 preliminary injunction restricted the university from blocking or muting its posts, and the legal proceedings culminated in a settlement requiring the university to overhaul its social media practices.

Under the agreement, UO must now end viewpoint-based censorship, establish an appeals process for blocked users, provide annual First Amendment training to social media staff, and operate under court oversight for 180 days to ensure compliance.

If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, join Reclaim The Net.

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Resist censorship. Reject surveillance. Reclaim your voice.

Support the exposure of censorship and surveillance, and protect your digital rights:

Share this post