Defend free speech and individual liberty online. 

Push back against big tech and media gatekeepers.

Another study debunks the media’s “YouTube radicalization” theory

Despite all the evidence to the contrary, the "radicalization" myth remains.
If you're tired of censorship, cancel culture, and the erosion of civil liberties subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

A recent study produced by a US-based software engineer and a postdoctoral researcher into the notion that YouTube’s recommendations algorithms somehow serve to boost the right-wing movement in this world – doesn’t seem to hold up.

The software engineer, Mark Ledwich, who worked with UC Berkley post-doc Anna Zaitsev on the study, detailed the findings in a post published on Medium.

>Read the Study<

Criticism at YouTube’s expense today prominently includes accusations that the Google-owned platform goes out of its way to suppress any hint of ideological dissent differing from the ruling liberal mores in the US, by pretty much any means necessary – including such highly controversial policies like deplatforming and demonetization to keep anything being, or even resembling right-wing politics off any visible, and therefore influential and monetizable place on the platform.

This is something that you might in another time and/or place refer simply as, “ideological censorship.”

Yet – in 2019, the New York Times decided to try arguing the case of YouTube actually being a bastion of alt-right ideology – by publishing an article authored by Kevin Roose, featuring a liberal college dropout who claimed YouTube’s recommendations tab was “a vortex of far-right politics” that was responsible for turning him into a “alt-right radical.”

Was Roose’s bafflingly visually presented piece an attempt to maintain YouTube’s credibility as an “equal opportunity political offender” – despite the mounting evidence that it had long since taken its (opposite) side, and was making sure to support it?

In any case, it was enough to prompt a media narrative about YouTube’s alleged role as some kind of “algorithmic champion” of ideology – but now the study carried out by Ledwich and Zaitsev – based on more than 760 political channels on YouTube across the ideological landscape, and more than 23 million recommendations for 675,000 videos uploaded since 2018 – found no evidence of this.

Similar data has found the same.

If anything – the researchers discovered that YouTube is now basically attempting to appease all, and attract the least amount of criticism.

In the words of the study – YouTube’s late 2019 algorithm is “not a radicalization pipeline (…) in fact it removes almost all recommendations for conspiracy theorists, provocateurs and white identitarians; benefits mainstream partisan channels such as Fox News and Last Week Tonight; disadvantages almost everyone else.”

In light of its data and subsequent findings, the study takes issue with the notion of “authoritative sources” and what’s referred to as “old media” – and the “war” these continue to wage on “decentralized” – i.e., the new, web-based media.

If you're tired of censorship, cancel culture, and the erosion of civil liberties subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Defend free speech and individual liberty online. 

Push back against big tech and media gatekeepers.

Push back against online censorship, 

cancel culture, and privacy invasion. 

Informed by principles on digital rights.

Share

MindsGab