California Governor Gavin Newsom has announced that 480 new cameras are being installed “along freeways and in Oakland to make the area safer.”
Describing the cameras as “high tech,” the Democrat said in a video posted on X that this will “help law enforcement identify vehicles linked to crimes using real-time information and alerts.”
Related:Â How Neglected Rising Crime Levels Are Fueling the Push Towards a Cashless Surveillance State
What Newsom was talking about are Flock Safety’s cameras that critics say are used to create AI-powered mass surveillance networks that keep a very close eye on movement but also the behavior of people caught in its “sights.”
Flock is in the business of automatic number plate recognition tech, primarily sold to law enforcement, that can be installed even in areas with no electricity by using solar panels. The real-time component stems from Flock using databases of cars “marked” in advance, while the cameras’ connection to phone towers means the police and federal agencies can be alerted to their location instantly.
In addition to raising the issue of mass surveillance as such, and how even nominally democratic governments can swiftly descend into authoritarianism (see: pandemic restrictions), something that is vastly aided by said surveillance, there is also the question of the veracity of the claims of the effectiveness of systems like that currently touted by Governor Newsom.
The big political picture further reveals the fact that crime rates have been soaring in California and that those in power there are obviously under pressure to do something about it; but, observers note, they would also like to either do something or create an illusion of that without earmarking more money for law enforcement.
And here turning to “AI cameras” comes in handy, since their proliferation is for the most part financed by the 2022 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, whose funds amount to $15.6 billion.
The Biden White House decided that up to 10 percent of this can be used by states to buy automated traffic enforcement tools such as cameras.
Flock has sought to assuage privacy, and ultimately, safety concerns among law-abiding citizens by saying that the tech behind the cameras does not use facial recognition – or is activated over “simple traffic violations.”
But, as critics point out, that may not be necessary once this “infrastructure” is in place – since law enforcement has its own facial recognition tools that can use the data harvested by the cameras.
