A student who shared a pandemic video in a private chat walked away cleared, with a tribunal drawing a line that offended feelings and illegal discrimination are not the same thing.
The damage is already done, but it turns out freezing the bank accounts of civil liberties protesters was never legal to begin with.
Lawmakers pressed Meta and Google to explain how far White House outreach went in shaping their censorship decisions.
Google admits bending to political pressure, but only long after the damage was already done.
No charges, no violations. Just a severed account and a vanishing explanation.
A court-ordered paper trail may reveal the blueprint of a financial crackdown with no convictions in sight.
DOJ joins antitrust case against BBC, Reuters, AP, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and TNI over alleged suppression of independent media.
The Court’s silence leaves a tangled web of speech, power, and platforms untouched.
A pandemic-era workaround inches closer to permanence, swapping consent for convenience in the name of public health.
Parents with questions became potential suspects in a bureaucratic algorithm built to profile dissent.
WHO, Meta, and Silicon Valley plan long-term digital health alliance focused on narrative control and behavior change.
The White House targets past alliances as a censorship crusade wrapped in a national security concern.
Carney’s pivot from banker to PM comes with a memory hole big enough to swallow the Emergencies Act.
NIH staff scramble to trace paper trails as the agency braces for a free-speech reckoning under its new chief.
Silenced for questioning the orthodoxy, Bhattacharya now holds the microphone at the institution that once turned it off.
The Supreme Court’s request suggests growing judicial interest in the relationship between tech platforms and government influence.
ADF seeks transparency on NSF’s role in online speech moderation with FOIA requests.
The case’s future hangs in the balance as the court weighs whether Trump’s executive order renders it moot.
Johnson demands internal records on Facebook’s removal of vaccine injury support groups and alleged government pressure.
The inquiry is more focused on justifying government censorship than exposing it.
PayPal’s internal documents reveal a politically charged decision-making process behind Covid-era account closures.
His own record on censorship casts a shadow.
Dr. Drew condemns YouTube’s demand for “reeducation” after video takedowns, calling it a threat to free speech and medical dialogue.
Families demand accountability as social media censorship deepens the divide over vaccine injury discussions.
A student who shared a pandemic video in a private chat walked away cleared, with a tribunal drawing a line that offended feelings and illegal discrimination are not the same thing.
The damage is already done, but it turns out freezing the bank accounts of civil liberties protesters was never legal to begin with.
Lawmakers pressed Meta and Google to explain how far White House outreach went in shaping their censorship decisions.
Google admits bending to political pressure, but only long after the damage was already done.
No charges, no violations. Just a severed account and a vanishing explanation.
A court-ordered paper trail may reveal the blueprint of a financial crackdown with no convictions in sight.
DOJ joins antitrust case against BBC, Reuters, AP, Google, Meta, Microsoft, and TNI over alleged suppression of independent media.
The Court’s silence leaves a tangled web of speech, power, and platforms untouched.
A pandemic-era workaround inches closer to permanence, swapping consent for convenience in the name of public health.
Parents with questions became potential suspects in a bureaucratic algorithm built to profile dissent.
WHO, Meta, and Silicon Valley plan long-term digital health alliance focused on narrative control and behavior change.
The White House targets past alliances as a censorship crusade wrapped in a national security concern.
Carney’s pivot from banker to PM comes with a memory hole big enough to swallow the Emergencies Act.
NIH staff scramble to trace paper trails as the agency braces for a free-speech reckoning under its new chief.
Silenced for questioning the orthodoxy, Bhattacharya now holds the microphone at the institution that once turned it off.
The Supreme Court’s request suggests growing judicial interest in the relationship between tech platforms and government influence.
ADF seeks transparency on NSF’s role in online speech moderation with FOIA requests.
The case’s future hangs in the balance as the court weighs whether Trump’s executive order renders it moot.
Johnson demands internal records on Facebook’s removal of vaccine injury support groups and alleged government pressure.
The inquiry is more focused on justifying government censorship than exposing it.
PayPal’s internal documents reveal a politically charged decision-making process behind Covid-era account closures.
His own record on censorship casts a shadow.
Dr. Drew condemns YouTube’s demand for “reeducation” after video takedowns, calling it a threat to free speech and medical dialogue.
Families demand accountability as social media censorship deepens the divide over vaccine injury discussions.
