Clicky

From Blacklist to NIH: Bhattacharya’s Ascent and the Reckoning for The Science™

Silenced for questioning the orthodoxy, Bhattacharya now holds the microphone at the institution that once turned it off.

Bhattachary wearing glasses wearing a suit and tie is in the foreground, with a digitally altered image of a classical building in blue and red in the background.

Imagine spending your career studying infectious diseases, only to find that the real virus spreading uncontrollably is censorship. That was the reality for Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford epidemiologist who committed the unpardonable sin of questioning the COVID-19 lockdown orthodoxy. His punishment? Digital exile, courtesy of Silicon Valley’s Ministry of Truth.

In December 2022, the Twitter Files exposed what many had long suspected: Twitter had quietly placed Bhattacharya’s account on a Trends Blacklist. This ensured that his posts, often critical of lockdowns and mask mandates, would never see the light of day on the platform’s trending topics. In other words, Twitter’s algorithm worked like a digital bouncer, making sure his dissenting opinions never made it past the velvet rope.

A screenshot of a social media profile for a person named Jay Bhattacharya with a username @DrJBhattacharya. The profile header image shows an aerial view of a campus with red-tiled roofs, likely Stanford University. The profile statistics indicate 12.4K comments, 240.4K followers, 4.3K followed accounts, and a 0.04 rate. The status is marked as 'Active' with a 'Recent Abuse Strike', 'Trends Blacklist', and a 'Strike Count' of 0. The bio describes Jay Bhattacharya as a Professor at Stanford School of Medicine with expertise in health policy, infectious diseases, COVID-19, health economics, and scientific freedom."

And Twitter wasn’t alone. Facebook, ever eager to please its government handlers, scrubbed the Great Barrington Declaration from its pages. That document, co-authored by Bhattacharya and other esteemed scientists, dared to suggest that maybe, just maybe, locking down entire populations wasn’t the best strategy. Instead, it proposed focused protection for the most vulnerable while allowing the rest of society to function. For this, it was sent to the digital equivalent of a gulag.

Become a Member and Keep Reading…

Reclaim your digital freedom. Get the latest on censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance, and learn how to fight back.

Already a supporter? Sign In.

Share this post