Surveillance Nation on Trial

A major lawsuit tests the balance between public safety and constitutional privacy rights.

Aerial view of a city layout featuring a large body of water surrounded by urban infrastructure and green areas.

Flock Safety is a company that markets itself as providing ways to “eliminate crime in your community” – by means of collecting “evidence” via its license plate-reading cameras (ALPRs) that in turn supposedly allow law enforcement to solve crime quicker, thanks to Flock’s “city-wide safety platform.”

A new lawsuit, however, interprets Flock’s business as unconstitutional, i.e., as warrantless deployment of security cameras, that ends up producing dragnet-style mass surveillance.

Red shield logo with three stylized black and white arrows curving outward, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in grey and 'THE NET' in red

Become a Member and Keep Reading…

Reclaim your digital freedom. Get the latest on censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance, and learn how to fight back.

Already a supporter? Sign In.
(If you’re already logged in but still seeing this, refresh this page to show the post.)
Having trouble logging in? Get help here.

More you should know:

Share this post