Meta Pushes for a Digital ID Revolution
November 29, 2024
The proposed system could force users to tie real-world identities to their phones, raising critical questions about surveillance and data control.
The proposed system could force users to tie real-world identities to their phones, raising critical questions about surveillance and data control.
Meta suspends Smith & Wesson’s Facebook page, drawing sharp praise for Musk and X’s free-speech stance.
UK Parliament’s scrutiny of Musk raises questions about free speech and the real motives behind online regulation.
Tech giants face scrutiny for their roles in a “censorship cartel,” with free speech and ideological bias at the heart of the allegations.
The ruling revives a potential breakup of Meta, setting the stage for a historic antitrust battle over its social media empire.
Meta’s latest age verification tool signals a privacy battleground, using data-driven “guesswork” over user identities with no public transparency.
Meta’s Oversight Board warns that censoring political satire risks stifling legitimate speech, especially ahead of elections.
Meta revives facial recognition in its apps, aiming to tackle scams and enhance account recovery, but privacy concerns loom over the use of sensitive biometric data.
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr calls out Facebook for censoring a factual post criticizing the Biden-Harris administration’s $42 billion internet expansion plan.
Lawmakers argue that unchecked misinformation disrupts recovery efforts, while critics raise concerns about free speech and overreach.
PolitiFact dismisses Vance’s “censorship” claim, sparking criticism from Shellenberger over government pressure on social media giants.
More censorship demands.
Critics claim GIFCT’s opacity leaves questions about censorship, accountability, and the influence of Big Tech unchecked.
Behind the scenes of the European Parliament elections, tech giants dictated public discourse, censoring millions of posts under the guise of fact-checking.
“Collaboration” or control.
Direct censorship pressure.
Senators Klobuchar and Warner urge tech giants to crack down on election disinformation amid growing concerns over AI-generated content.
A lack of focus on free speech rights amid censorship concerns.
The White House dismisses Zuckerberg’s regret over government pressure, raising concerns about First Amendment erosion.
Congressional probes launched into Big Tech’s handling of Trump assassination attempt coverage spark fears of deliberate narrative control.
AG Letitia James urges AI and social media giants to curtail election misinformation, stoking debate over free speech and potential censorship.
Meta’s decision to shut down a content surveillance tool called CrowdTangle, announced earlier in the year and about to take effect next month, has met
A “fact-check” suppressed the image.
Government demands for stricter content control raise concerns over free speech and algorithmic overreach.
The proposed system could force users to tie real-world identities to their phones, raising critical questions about surveillance and data control.
Meta suspends Smith & Wesson’s Facebook page, drawing sharp praise for Musk and X’s free-speech stance.
UK Parliament’s scrutiny of Musk raises questions about free speech and the real motives behind online regulation.
Tech giants face scrutiny for their roles in a “censorship cartel,” with free speech and ideological bias at the heart of the allegations.
The ruling revives a potential breakup of Meta, setting the stage for a historic antitrust battle over its social media empire.
Meta’s latest age verification tool signals a privacy battleground, using data-driven “guesswork” over user identities with no public transparency.
Meta’s Oversight Board warns that censoring political satire risks stifling legitimate speech, especially ahead of elections.
Meta revives facial recognition in its apps, aiming to tackle scams and enhance account recovery, but privacy concerns loom over the use of sensitive biometric data.
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr calls out Facebook for censoring a factual post criticizing the Biden-Harris administration’s $42 billion internet expansion plan.
Lawmakers argue that unchecked misinformation disrupts recovery efforts, while critics raise concerns about free speech and overreach.
PolitiFact dismisses Vance’s “censorship” claim, sparking criticism from Shellenberger over government pressure on social media giants.
More censorship demands.
Critics claim GIFCT’s opacity leaves questions about censorship, accountability, and the influence of Big Tech unchecked.
Behind the scenes of the European Parliament elections, tech giants dictated public discourse, censoring millions of posts under the guise of fact-checking.
“Collaboration” or control.
Direct censorship pressure.
Senators Klobuchar and Warner urge tech giants to crack down on election disinformation amid growing concerns over AI-generated content.
A lack of focus on free speech rights amid censorship concerns.
The White House dismisses Zuckerberg’s regret over government pressure, raising concerns about First Amendment erosion.
Congressional probes launched into Big Tech’s handling of Trump assassination attempt coverage spark fears of deliberate narrative control.
AG Letitia James urges AI and social media giants to curtail election misinformation, stoking debate over free speech and potential censorship.
Meta’s decision to shut down a content surveillance tool called CrowdTangle, announced earlier in the year and about to take effect next month, has met
A “fact-check” suppressed the image.
Government demands for stricter content control raise concerns over free speech and algorithmic overreach.
