Christina Maas
Christina is a Reclaim contributor who's interested in platforms, their policies, and their ability to push social and cultural conditions. [email protected]
MembersSnitch Nation: The Quiet War on Unapproved Opinions
The tools of academic hypersensitivity have quietly graduated into government protocol.
MembersFrom Boarding Pass to Bio-ID: Airports Become Frontlines in the Surveillance State
In a world obsessed with streamlining, opting out is no longer part of the itinerary.
Canada: Mark Carney Vows Internet Speech Crackdown if Elected, Citing Online “Pollution” of Misogyny, Conspiracies
Mark Carney dodges Epstein jabs in Hamilton while reviving failed Liberal plans for speech control via Bill C-36 and Bill C-63.
EU Targets Elon Musk’s X With Potential $1 Billion Fine Under Censorship Law
Brussels wants to tame the world’s noisiest platform with the world’s driest rulebook.
From Blacklist to NIH: Bhattacharya’s Ascent and the Reckoning for the Science™
Silenced for questioning the orthodoxy, Bhattacharya now holds the microphone at the institution that once turned it off.
Netflix’s Adolescence Is a Trojan Horse for Online Censorship and Surveillance Policy
A four-part sob story about screen time is being used to rewrite the rules of the internet.
MembersFrom Hashtag to Handcuffs: The AI Surveillance Machine Monitoring Protest Tweets
Your right to assemble now comes with a digital trail and a police escort.
NSW Premier Chris Minns Calls Free Speech a Government Liability
When politicians admit they fear free speech, it’s not about harmony — it’s about control.
Sydney’s Fake Antisemitic Terror Plot: How a Criminal Scam Led to Sweeping Censorship Laws
A lie fueled the panic, but the laws it birthed are here to stay.
MembersRoom 641A: Mark Klein and the NSA’s Perfect Crime
Klein exposed the backbone of mass surveillance, forcing America to confront the cost of its security state.
MembersBeyond Content: The Case That Could Redefine Free Speech and Social Media Censorship
A lawsuit against Snapchat challenges whether a platform’s design choices — not just user content — can make it legally responsible for illicit activity.