YouTube Bans Channel of Political Commentator Tayler Hansen
September 8, 2024
YouTube faces backlash for banning journalist without providing clear reasoning amid indictment fallout.
YouTube faces backlash for banning journalist without providing clear reasoning amid indictment fallout.
Algorithmic recommendations face new scrutiny.
The suspension sparked a debate on Big Tech’s influence in political discourse, echoing previous censorship concerns raised by the party.
AU10TIX’s alleged exposed credentials leave sensitive user data vulnerable, raising serious privacy and security concerns amidst rising demands for digital ID verification.
Does the push for regulation mask an agenda to control political discourse under the guise of combating disinformation?
Frustration mounts as Dr. Phil challenges the platform’s opaque moderation practices and their impact on freedom of information.
France’s sweeping state of emergency in New Caledonia includes a TikTok ban amid escalating tensions, highlighting the global trend of using internet shutdowns to control civil unrest.
Facing a potential national ban, TikTok creators sue the US government, arguing that the new law stifles their First Amendment rights and jeopardizes their economic survival.
TikTok’s legal challenge asserts that the new law not only threatens its existence but may also set a dangerous precedent for free speech online.
Kennedy challenges the impending TikTok ban, citing concerns over political motives rather than real national security issues.
TikTok will use AI to curb recommendations of so-called “hate speech,” “misinformation” and claims that “certain events or situations are carried out by covert or powerful groups, such as the government.”
The House’s TikTok ban, embedded in a broader foreign aid package, forces the Senate to reconsider its stance.
UK lawmakers push for a strategic assault on TikTok “misinformation,” emphasizing the “protection” of young minds as they drift from traditional news sources.
Punishing platforms for not censoring enough.
The bill grants the President comprehensive powers over online apps and websites.
The bill’s prospects in the Senate are more uncertain.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers has introduced a bill that forces TikTok’s parent company to divest its US operations.
Two major platform companies are pushing back against the EU’s attempt’s to police online speech.
An under-developed policy idea that could have wide-reaching implications.
A new move for the Chinese app.
More censorship. No explanations.
As a promise to COP28, TikTok is assembling a team of “Verified Champions.” What could possibly go wrong?
More pressure to censor.
YouTube faces backlash for banning journalist without providing clear reasoning amid indictment fallout.
Algorithmic recommendations face new scrutiny.
The suspension sparked a debate on Big Tech’s influence in political discourse, echoing previous censorship concerns raised by the party.
AU10TIX’s alleged exposed credentials leave sensitive user data vulnerable, raising serious privacy and security concerns amidst rising demands for digital ID verification.
Does the push for regulation mask an agenda to control political discourse under the guise of combating disinformation?
Frustration mounts as Dr. Phil challenges the platform’s opaque moderation practices and their impact on freedom of information.
France’s sweeping state of emergency in New Caledonia includes a TikTok ban amid escalating tensions, highlighting the global trend of using internet shutdowns to control civil unrest.
Facing a potential national ban, TikTok creators sue the US government, arguing that the new law stifles their First Amendment rights and jeopardizes their economic survival.
TikTok’s legal challenge asserts that the new law not only threatens its existence but may also set a dangerous precedent for free speech online.
Kennedy challenges the impending TikTok ban, citing concerns over political motives rather than real national security issues.
TikTok will use AI to curb recommendations of so-called “hate speech,” “misinformation” and claims that “certain events or situations are carried out by covert or powerful groups, such as the government.”
The House’s TikTok ban, embedded in a broader foreign aid package, forces the Senate to reconsider its stance.
UK lawmakers push for a strategic assault on TikTok “misinformation,” emphasizing the “protection” of young minds as they drift from traditional news sources.
Punishing platforms for not censoring enough.
The bill grants the President comprehensive powers over online apps and websites.
The bill’s prospects in the Senate are more uncertain.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers has introduced a bill that forces TikTok’s parent company to divest its US operations.
Two major platform companies are pushing back against the EU’s attempt’s to police online speech.
An under-developed policy idea that could have wide-reaching implications.
A new move for the Chinese app.
More censorship. No explanations.
As a promise to COP28, TikTok is assembling a team of “Verified Champions.” What could possibly go wrong?
More pressure to censor.