Topic: generative AI
Generative AI raises significant concerns regarding censorship, surveillance, and privacy. As governments and organizations push for stricter regulations and oversight, the potential for misuse and control over AI-generated content threatens free expression. The ongoing debates around licensing and anonymity highlight the risks of allowing gatekeepers to dictate the terms of access and use of these technologies.
-
UK Parliament Rejects Petition to Repeal Online Censorship Law, Calls for Expanded Censorship
Lawmakers promised to protect free speech by regulating nearly every way it can occur online.
-
UK Report Says Online Censorship Law Doesn’t Go Far Enough
The state’s answer to unrest is to algorithmically erase anything that might have caused it.
-
Alexa’s Privacy Backtrack: Amazon Pushes All Voice Data to the Cloud
Amazon is stripping away a key privacy safeguard, forcing every Alexa request through its servers.
-
World Economic Forum Calls For “Collective Action” To Fight “Misinformation” and “Disinformation”
More anti-free speech pressure.
-
Senators Want To Control AI So It Can’t Produce “Misinformation”
Who gets to decide what’s misinformation?
-
Senators: Only Companies With A Government-Approved License Should Be Able To Offer Generative AI Tools
Gatekeeping so that AI is controlled by powerful corporations who will impose restrictions at the behest of the government.
-
Eric Schmidt testifies that there should be no “true anonymity” when accessing generative AI platforms
A proposal to expand the digital surveillance dragnet.








