After the Bondi Beach attack, Canberra’s push for tighter online controls is colliding with growing legal resistance over who decides what newsworthy content and Australians are allowed to watch.
Reddit’s challenge sets up a major test of Australia’s plan to verify every user’s age online.
America’s proposed travel rules could turn a simple vacation application into a government scan of a tourist’s digital footprint.
A new immigration filter asks not just what foreign tech workers can build, but what speech they’ve helped bury.
A constitutional showdown that could redefine how Australians prove who they are just to speak online.
By going after algorithms instead of posts, lawmakers seem to think they’re not going against the First Amendment.
The decision marks a courtroom win for Big Tech in an era when regulators are still arguing over what the market even is.
An Italian court’s pushback against Google turns a local censorship dispute into a landmark test.
The investigation into X exposes how Europe’s new speech laws let regulators decide which voices get to exist online.
WhatsApp’s move into public broadcasting now puts Meta face-to-face with Europe’s toughest censorship rulebook.
The inquiry marks a pivotal test of how financial institutions handle politically sensitive clients under federal scrutiny.
California’s push to verify every user’s age online inches closer to reality as the state tests the limits of privacy in the name of protection.
The hearing peeled back the veneer on a messaging machine struggling to control the story even as the footage told its own.
The newly uncovered email exposes a quiet intersection of government power and social media control just days before voters went to the polls.
Could Britain’s online censorship push be drifting toward a point where using a VPN could be seen as an act of resistance?
Behind closed doors, Stanford’s gathering with global regulators became the latest flashpoint in a widening probe of how speech policing quietly crosses borders.
A plan to shield kids from social media addiction could end up forcing every Californian to trade privacy for permission to speak online.
Inman Grant’s campaign now reaches from TikTok feeds to AI chatrooms, pulling the entire digital ecosystem into her jurisdiction.
The EU claims Meta’s “dark patterns” discourage users from flagging material.
The promise of unity is starting to sound like a contract written in conditional freedoms.
For the first time, design choices, not just direct speech, are being treated as moral acts in a court of law.
Texas’s age-check law would strip users of digital privacy and restrict free speech.
Bill C-9 dresses its intent in compassion while quietly redrawing the limits of public dissent.
A judge just told the government that emailing censorship demands have no legal authority.
After the Bondi Beach attack, Canberra’s push for tighter online controls is colliding with growing legal resistance over who decides what newsworthy content and Australians are allowed to watch.
Reddit’s challenge sets up a major test of Australia’s plan to verify every user’s age online.
America’s proposed travel rules could turn a simple vacation application into a government scan of a tourist’s digital footprint.
A new immigration filter asks not just what foreign tech workers can build, but what speech they’ve helped bury.
A constitutional showdown that could redefine how Australians prove who they are just to speak online.
By going after algorithms instead of posts, lawmakers seem to think they’re not going against the First Amendment.
The decision marks a courtroom win for Big Tech in an era when regulators are still arguing over what the market even is.
An Italian court’s pushback against Google turns a local censorship dispute into a landmark test.
The investigation into X exposes how Europe’s new speech laws let regulators decide which voices get to exist online.
WhatsApp’s move into public broadcasting now puts Meta face-to-face with Europe’s toughest censorship rulebook.
The inquiry marks a pivotal test of how financial institutions handle politically sensitive clients under federal scrutiny.
California’s push to verify every user’s age online inches closer to reality as the state tests the limits of privacy in the name of protection.
The hearing peeled back the veneer on a messaging machine struggling to control the story even as the footage told its own.
The newly uncovered email exposes a quiet intersection of government power and social media control just days before voters went to the polls.
Could Britain’s online censorship push be drifting toward a point where using a VPN could be seen as an act of resistance?
Behind closed doors, Stanford’s gathering with global regulators became the latest flashpoint in a widening probe of how speech policing quietly crosses borders.
A plan to shield kids from social media addiction could end up forcing every Californian to trade privacy for permission to speak online.
Inman Grant’s campaign now reaches from TikTok feeds to AI chatrooms, pulling the entire digital ecosystem into her jurisdiction.
The EU claims Meta’s “dark patterns” discourage users from flagging material.
The promise of unity is starting to sound like a contract written in conditional freedoms.
For the first time, design choices, not just direct speech, are being treated as moral acts in a court of law.
Texas’s age-check law would strip users of digital privacy and restrict free speech.
Bill C-9 dresses its intent in compassion while quietly redrawing the limits of public dissent.
A judge just told the government that emailing censorship demands have no legal authority.
