Topic: Martin Kulldorff
Martin Kulldorff’s case highlights the ongoing battle against government and Big Tech censorship, particularly in the area of public health discourse. His experiences with platforms like LinkedIn and Twitter illustrate how individual voices can be silenced under pressure from authorities, raising significant concerns about free speech and the integrity of scientific debate. This situation highlights the need for vigilance in protecting individual liberties against censorship and surveillance.
-
NCLA Asks The Supreme Court Not To Stay Injunction Against Government Social Media Censorship
In support of free speech.
-
Appeals Court Is Asked To Uphold Biden Social Media Censorship Ban
Oral arguments will be made this month.
-
Biden admin was “very angry” Twitter wouldn’t censor more aggressively – Twitter Files
“The Biden team was not satisfied with Twitter’s enforcement approach as they wanted Twitter to do more and to de-platform…
-
New Civil Liberties Alliance joins lawsuit against Biden administration for Big Tech censorship collusion
NCLA has represented many censored voices.
-
LinkedIn censors Harvard medical professor Martin Kulldorff
LinkedIn thinks it knows better.
-
Florida Gov Ron DeSantis joins Rumble after Big Tech censorship
Rumble is a fast-growing YouTube alternative.
-
Twitter censors CDC advisor and Harvard Medical School professor, Martin Kulldorff
Another leading expert censored by a social platform.
-
Facebook deletes epidemiologists behind The Great Barrington Declaration
No reasons given.
-
Reddit mods delete The Great Barrington Declaration, an anti-lockdown statement from world’s top scientists
Mods say it breaks the rules.