Government suppression and Big Tech collusion reshaped the COVID-19 origin debate, sidelining key intelligence in favor of an official narrative.
New US report highlights federal attempts to regulate AI for censorship, proposing free speech-focused legislation to protect open innovation.
The US House Judiciary Committee warns of the international “Censorship Industrial Complex.”
The House Judiciary Committee report suggests FTC actions may reflect punitive bias rather than regulatory oversight.
The Judiciary Committee expands its probe into Big Tech censorship, as YouTube faces scrutiny for blocking an FBI whistleblower’s interview.
FBI analyst’s testimony is sought on online suppression of the laptop’s legitimacy amid 2020 election interference claims.
Zuckerberg acknowledges regrets over decisions made under pressure while outlining Meta’s new stance on content moderation.
House Judiciary Committee escalates a transatlantic free speech battle, accusing the EU of wielding regulations as political weapons.
Examining whether the advertising initiative crossed the line from brand “safety” to censorship.
Wray’s remarks reveal a controversial stance that many see as an attack on essential online security measures.
CEO Chris Pavlovski calls out the Global Alliance for Responsible Media as an “advertising cartel.”
Musk accuses global advertising alliance of leveraging ad dollars for online censorship.
A familiar pattern.
Potential violations of federal antitrust laws highlight GARM’s significant influence and its role in shaping online discourse.
Lawmakers suspect the alliance’s “brand safety” measures might mask a bias.
House demands transparency on SIO’s past and future involvement in election-related speech monitoring.
Jim Jordan emphasizes the urgent need to protect free speech from government interference.
Documents reveal creation of “Do Not Promote” category, sparking criticism over government influence.
Some things never change.
The committee seeks clarity on Fauci’s alleged role in suppressing lab leak discussions and silencing dissent.
Probe threatens GARM’s focus on initiatives amid accusations of conservative viewpoint censorship.
The US House Judiciary Committee, which is investigating the disgraced and disbanded Disinformation Governance Board (a part of the Department of Homeland Security, DHS), has
Using threats and hefty fines, Brazil cracks down on social media accounts questioning election integrity.
Newly released documents shed light on Facebook’s internal turmoil and sharp exchanges with the Biden administration over COVID-19 speech.
Government suppression and Big Tech collusion reshaped the COVID-19 origin debate, sidelining key intelligence in favor of an official narrative.
New US report highlights federal attempts to regulate AI for censorship, proposing free speech-focused legislation to protect open innovation.
The US House Judiciary Committee warns of the international “Censorship Industrial Complex.”
The House Judiciary Committee report suggests FTC actions may reflect punitive bias rather than regulatory oversight.
The Judiciary Committee expands its probe into Big Tech censorship, as YouTube faces scrutiny for blocking an FBI whistleblower’s interview.
FBI analyst’s testimony is sought on online suppression of the laptop’s legitimacy amid 2020 election interference claims.
Zuckerberg acknowledges regrets over decisions made under pressure while outlining Meta’s new stance on content moderation.
House Judiciary Committee escalates a transatlantic free speech battle, accusing the EU of wielding regulations as political weapons.
Examining whether the advertising initiative crossed the line from brand “safety” to censorship.
Wray’s remarks reveal a controversial stance that many see as an attack on essential online security measures.
CEO Chris Pavlovski calls out the Global Alliance for Responsible Media as an “advertising cartel.”
Musk accuses global advertising alliance of leveraging ad dollars for online censorship.
A familiar pattern.
Potential violations of federal antitrust laws highlight GARM’s significant influence and its role in shaping online discourse.
Lawmakers suspect the alliance’s “brand safety” measures might mask a bias.
House demands transparency on SIO’s past and future involvement in election-related speech monitoring.
Jim Jordan emphasizes the urgent need to protect free speech from government interference.
Documents reveal creation of “Do Not Promote” category, sparking criticism over government influence.
Some things never change.
The committee seeks clarity on Fauci’s alleged role in suppressing lab leak discussions and silencing dissent.
Probe threatens GARM’s focus on initiatives amid accusations of conservative viewpoint censorship.
The US House Judiciary Committee, which is investigating the disgraced and disbanded Disinformation Governance Board (a part of the Department of Homeland Security, DHS), has
Using threats and hefty fines, Brazil cracks down on social media accounts questioning election integrity.
Newly released documents shed light on Facebook’s internal turmoil and sharp exchanges with the Biden administration over COVID-19 speech.
